Children's Nonfiction and National Trauma: The Case of Smyrna's Catastrophe—a Literature of Critical Engagement or a Literature of Facts?

Abstract: This article examines how contemporary Greek historical nonfiction for children engages with national trauma, focusing on three titles published during the 2022 centenary of the Asia Minor Catastrophe. Drawing on Sanders's framework of critical nonfiction and Seixas and Morton's historical thinking concepts, the study analyzes narrative stance, visual strategies, peritexts, and the use of primary sources to assess whether these texts promote inquiry or reinforce authoritative, ideologically framed accounts. The analysis reveals that while the books prioritize factual accuracy and emotional resonance, they largely suppress alternative perspectives and critical reflection, favoring national coherence and commemorative closure. Photographs and testimonies serve to elicit empathy but rarely provoke historical questioning. However, subtle gaps and visual ambiguities offer limited entry points for critical engagement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bookbird/Book bird
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/bkb.2025.a969638
Primary Topic
Central European Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's Nonfiction and National Trauma: The Case of Smyrna's Catastrophe—a Literature of Critical Engagement or a Literature of Facts?

Chryssa Kouraki
Bookbird/Book bird
Central European Literary Studies
article

Children's Nonfiction and National Trauma: The Case of Smyrna's Catastrophe—a Literature of Critical Engagement or a Literature of Facts?

Chryssa Kouraki
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines how contemporary Greek historical nonfiction for children engages with national trauma, focusing on three titles published during the 2022 centenary of the Asia Minor Catastrophe. Drawing on Sanders's framework of critical nonfiction and Seixas and Morton's historical thinking concepts, the study analyzes narrative stance, visual strategies, peritexts, and the use of primary sources to assess whether these texts promote inquiry or reinforce authoritative, ideologically framed accounts. The analysis reveals that while the books prioritize factual accuracy and emotional resonance, they largely suppress alternative perspectives and critical reflection, favoring national coherence and commemorative closure. Photographs and testimonies serve to elicit empathy but rarely provoke historical questioning. However, subtle gaps and visual ambiguities offer limited entry points for critical engagement.

Bookbird/Book birdVol. 63(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Central European Literary Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.