THE PATH TO SECURITY: MODELS AND MECHANISMS FOR MAINTAINING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

Security is a central theme in international relations and modern political science, particularly given the evolving security landscape in Europe and globally. Traditional mechanisms for maintaining stability, such as the balance of power, defense alliances, and collective security, have demonstrated limitations. European integration offers a potential alternative, capable of transforming international interactions and mitigating the risk of conflict. This study aims to identify the characteristics of different security models and assess their effectiveness within the current international system. It focuses on the correlation between traditional security approaches (balance of power, defensive alliances) and newer models based on integration and international institutionalization. The research employs a comparative analysis of international security concepts, a historical method to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches retrospectively, and a structural analysis of international security systems. An institutional approach is also utilized to assess the role of international organizations in shaping security policy. The study reveals that traditional security mechanisms, such as defense alliances and the balance of power, remain relevant but pose significant risks, including conflict escalation and heightened security dilemma. While joining forces enhances participants' defense capabilities, forming a basis for deterrence – a key condition for avoiding aggression – these alliances can also create rivalries and instability. Collective security, despite its international legitimacy, often struggles with implementation due to a lack of unified member-state positions. The difficulty of establishing a truly universal collective security system, coupled with the prominent role of great powers in world politics, suggests a simpler system: collective action by great powers interested in maintaining the status quo, even without formal obligations to counter aggression as seen in collective defense systems. The modern international security system, anchored by the United Nations (UN), blends elements of collective security and a concert of nations (requiring unanimity among the Security Council's permanent members), incorporating functional cooperation to address conflict sources. A more effective approach to security combines traditional models with deepened interdependence. This mitigates the structural causes of conflict and fosters a new kind of international interaction. The European Union provides a successful example of this synergistic approach to security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of V N Karazin Kharkov National University Issues of Political Science
Published
2024-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2024-46-02
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PATH TO SECURITY: MODELS AND MECHANISMS FOR MAINTAINING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

Mykola Gnatiuk
The Journal of V N Karazin Kharkov National University Issues of Political Science
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

THE PATH TO SECURITY: MODELS AND MECHANISMS FOR MAINTAINING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

Mykola Gnatiuk
article en

Abstract

Security is a central theme in international relations and modern political science, particularly given the evolving security landscape in Europe and globally. Traditional mechanisms for maintaining stability, such as the balance of power, defense alliances, and collective security, have demonstrated limitations. European integration offers a potential alternative, capable of transforming international interactions and mitigating the risk of conflict. This study aims to identify the characteristics of different security models and assess their effectiveness within the current international system. It focuses on the correlation between traditional security approaches (balance of power, defensive alliances) and newer models based on integration and international institutionalization. The research employs a comparative analysis of international security concepts, a historical method to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches retrospectively, and a structural analysis of international security systems. An institutional approach is also utilized to assess the role of international organizations in shaping security policy. The study reveals that traditional security mechanisms, such as defense alliances and the balance of power, remain relevant but pose significant risks, including conflict escalation and heightened security dilemma. While joining forces enhances participants' defense capabilities, forming a basis for deterrence – a key condition for avoiding aggression – these alliances can also create rivalries and instability. Collective security, despite its international legitimacy, often struggles with implementation due to a lack of unified member-state positions. The difficulty of establishing a truly universal collective security system, coupled with the prominent role of great powers in world politics, suggests a simpler system: collective action by great powers interested in maintaining the status quo, even without formal obligations to counter aggression as seen in collective defense systems. The modern international security system, anchored by the United Nations (UN), blends elements of collective security and a concert of nations (requiring unanimity among the Security Council's permanent members), incorporating functional cooperation to address conflict sources. A more effective approach to security combines traditional models with deepened interdependence. This mitigates the structural causes of conflict and fosters a new kind of international interaction. The European Union provides a successful example of this synergistic approach to security.

The Journal of V N Karazin Kharkov National University Issues of Political Science(46)
National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.