Navigating Liability in Automated Healthcare: Designing Multi-Stakeholder Framework for Responsibility in AI-Powered Health Care Systems

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a powerful tool in healthcare, offering faster diagnoses, better treatment planning, and improved patient care. But there is a serious ethical and legal problem: who is responsible if an AI system makes a mistake that harms a patient? Current legal systems were designed for situations where humans make decisions. They don’t work well when responsibility is spread across many people and organizations, and the AI’s decision-making is hidden inside a “black box.” The old model, where the doctor is the only one held responsible, doesn’t fit this new reality. This article argues that responsibility should be shared between three main groups — developers, healthcare providers, and regulators — under a principle called “technological due care”. This means everyone involved must take active steps to prevent harm at every stage of the AI’s life cycle. We will examine the weaknesses of current legal approaches, explain the ethical reasoning for a new system, and present a practical framework for safer AI use in healthcare.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.908000466
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Liability in Automated Healthcare: Designing Multi-Stakeholder Framework for Responsibility in AI-Powered Health Care Systems

Ndage Kizito Nji
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Navigating Liability in Automated Healthcare: Designing Multi-Stakeholder Framework for Responsibility in AI-Powered Health Care Systems

Ndage Kizito Nji
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a powerful tool in healthcare, offering faster diagnoses, better treatment planning, and improved patient care. But there is a serious ethical and legal problem: who is responsible if an AI system makes a mistake that harms a patient? Current legal systems were designed for situations where humans make decisions. They don’t work well when responsibility is spread across many people and organizations, and the AI’s decision-making is hidden inside a “black box.” The old model, where the doctor is the only one held responsible, doesn’t fit this new reality. This article argues that responsibility should be shared between three main groups — developers, healthcare providers, and regulators — under a principle called “technological due care”. This means everyone involved must take active steps to prevent harm at every stage of the AI’s life cycle. We will examine the weaknesses of current legal approaches, explain the ethical reasoning for a new system, and present a practical framework for safer AI use in healthcare.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social ScienceVol. IX(VIII)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Liability in Automated Healthcare: Designing Multi-Stakeholder Framework for Responsibility in AI-Powered Health Care Systems — Ndage Kizito Nji · International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS