Testing Three Alternate Methods to Direct Observation in Measuring Use of Discrete Youth Cognitive Behavioral Techniques: A Secondary Analysis
Unlike previous findings using an aggregate score, we found that both BR and CSR did not differ significantly from DO for most techniques tested. These findings have implications within implementation research and usual care settings; they support multiple viable measurement methods that are less resource-intensive than DO.
Authors
- Rinad S. Beidas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-6071)
- Simone H. Schriger
- Shannon Dorsey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-0294)
- David S. Mandell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-820X)
- Emily M. Becker‐Haimes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-8667)
- Bryce D. McLeod (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-0492)
- Sonja K. Schoenwald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0560-8440)
- Steven C. Marcus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7819-3824)
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Oregon Social Learning Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
- Seattle University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Implementation Research and Practice
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895251369899
- Primary Topic
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00