Implantation, removal, and adjustment of the totally implantable venous access port under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography: a ten-year experience at a territory medical center
Implantation, removal, and adjustment of the venous port access under DSA guidance were safe and efficient. For the removal and adjustment of complicated cases, using the pigtail catheter and/or gooseneck snare under DSA guidance was efficient. In addition, the IJV seems to be a safer venous access site with a lower complication rate than the SCV.
Authors
- Huimin Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3736-1745)
- Xiangwen Xia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5798-1909)
- Yaowei Bai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2360-1445)
- Yingliang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-0493)
- Xiangjun Dong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-9461)
- Chen Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7659-8083)
- Chuansheng Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-1417)
Institutions
- Union Hospital (HK)
- Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying Mapping and Remote Sensing (CN)
- Tongji Hospital (CN)
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Published
- 2025-08-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2563380
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00