A Comparative Study of Flash Nanoprecipitation and Sequential Nanoprecipitation: Impact of Formulation Parameters on Drug-Loaded Nanoparticle Formation

Flash NanoPrecipitation (FNP) is a well-established method for forming core-shell drug-loaded nanoparticles that has demonstrated effectiveness for encapsulating highly hydrophobic compounds. However, certain formulation challenges persist, including size limitations and reduced encapsulation efficiency for moderately hydrophobic drugs. Sequential NanoPrecipitation (SNaP) is a novel nanoparticle synthesis process that relies on the same assembly principle as FNP, while decoupling the core formation and stabilization. Through a systematic comparison using drugs with varying hydrophobicity, we demonstrate complementary capabilities between these techniques. We showed that for the high hydrophobicity drugs such as β-carotene, both SNaP and FNP performed effectively. In the case of cinnarizine, a moderately hydrophobic drug that requires the use of hydrophobic ion pairing, good encapsulation efficiency was observed for the case of SNaP, while no encapsulation was observed with FNP. For ibuprofen, a water-soluble analgesic, low encapsulation efficiency was observed with SNaP, and no loading was observed with FNP. Release studies with itraconazole nanoparticles revealed that SNaP-produced nanoparticles exhibited approximately 50% slower release rates compared to FNP over 48 h. Additionally, SNaP enabled access to a broader size range and successful nanoparticle formation at lower solid concentrations. These findings establish SNaP as a valuable complement to FNP, particularly for applications requiring larger nanoparticles, encapsulation of moderately hydrophobic compounds, or modified release kinetics. Together, these nanoprecipitation approaches provide formulators with expanded capabilities for developing polymeric nanoparticle drug delivery systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c00835
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Flash Nanoprecipitation and Sequential Nanoprecipitation: Impact of Formulation Parameters on Drug-Loaded Nanoparticle Formation

Parker K. Lewis, Amy H. McKinstry, Rachel E. Pollard, Nouha El Amri et al.
6 citations
Molecular Pharmaceutics
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
3.58
article

A Comparative Study of Flash Nanoprecipitation and Sequential Nanoprecipitation: Impact of Formulation Parameters on Drug-Loaded Nanoparticle Formation

Parker K. Lewis, Amy H. McKinstry, Rachel E. Pollard, Nouha El Amri, Nathalie M. Pinkerton
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Flash NanoPrecipitation (FNP) is a well-established method for forming core-shell drug-loaded nanoparticles that has demonstrated effectiveness for encapsulating highly hydrophobic compounds. However, certain formulation challenges persist, including size limitations and reduced encapsulation efficiency for moderately hydrophobic drugs. Sequential NanoPrecipitation (SNaP) is a novel nanoparticle synthesis process that relies on the same assembly principle as FNP, while decoupling the core formation and stabilization. Through a systematic comparison using drugs with varying hydrophobicity, we demonstrate complementary capabilities between these techniques. We showed that for the high hydrophobicity drugs such as β-carotene, both SNaP and FNP performed effectively. In the case of cinnarizine, a moderately hydrophobic drug that requires the use of hydrophobic ion pairing, good encapsulation efficiency was observed for the case of SNaP, while no encapsulation was observed with FNP. For ibuprofen, a water-soluble analgesic, low encapsulation efficiency was observed with SNaP, and no loading was observed with FNP. Release studies with itraconazole nanoparticles revealed that SNaP-produced nanoparticles exhibited approximately 50% slower release rates compared to FNP over 48 h. Additionally, SNaP enabled access to a broader size range and successful nanoparticle formation at lower solid concentrations. These findings establish SNaP as a valuable complement to FNP, particularly for applications requiring larger nanoparticles, encapsulation of moderately hydrophobic compounds, or modified release kinetics. Together, these nanoprecipitation approaches provide formulators with expanded capabilities for developing polymeric nanoparticle drug delivery systems.

Molecular PharmaceuticsVol. 22(10)
New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.