Policymaking Opportunities for Noncoercive Mental Health Treatment

Public opinion research related to mental illness and substance use disorders typically investigates opinions about people with these conditions (eg, stigma or perceptions of dangerousness), public policies related to these conditions (eg, insurance coverage for treatment or government spending), or both.Shields et al 1 surveyed 1442 US adults to discern their views on policies that support noncoercive (provided with a person's informed consent and willing participation) and coercive (provided against someone's wishes) treatment.They also stratified their findings by political party affiliation (Democrat, Republican, or Independent).Across the whole sample, 72.64% endorsed support for community-based mental health services and 65.10% supported peer-led services.For coercive policies, support ranged from 39.90% for making it easier to force people to take psychiatric medications to 53.07% for making it easier to force people with substance use disorder to receive treatment against their will.When stratified

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.32350
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policymaking Opportunities for Noncoercive Mental Health Treatment

Haley Graver, Rachel Presskreischer
JAMA Network Open
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Policymaking Opportunities for Noncoercive Mental Health Treatment

Haley Graver, Rachel Presskreischer
article en

Abstract

Public opinion research related to mental illness and substance use disorders typically investigates opinions about people with these conditions (eg, stigma or perceptions of dangerousness), public policies related to these conditions (eg, insurance coverage for treatment or government spending), or both.Shields et al 1 surveyed 1442 US adults to discern their views on policies that support noncoercive (provided with a person's informed consent and willing participation) and coercive (provided against someone's wishes) treatment.They also stratified their findings by political party affiliation (Democrat, Republican, or Independent).Across the whole sample, 72.64% endorsed support for community-based mental health services and 65.10% supported peer-led services.For coercive policies, support ranged from 39.90% for making it easier to force people to take psychiatric medications to 53.07% for making it easier to force people with substance use disorder to receive treatment against their will.When stratified

JAMA Network OpenVol. 8(9)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Policymaking Opportunities for Noncoercive Mental Health Treatment — Haley Graver, Rachel Presskreischer · JAMA Network Open (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS