Appraisal of Clinical Explanatory Variables in Subtyping of Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Models

<b>Background</b>: Clustering type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains a challenge due to its clinical heterogeneity and multifactorial nature. We aimed to evaluate the validity and robustness of the clinical variables in defining T2D subtypes using a discovery-to-prediction design. <b>Methods</b>: Five explanatory clinical aetiology variables (fasting serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, body mass index, age at diagnosis and HbA1c) were assessed for clustering T2D subtypes using two independent patient datasets. Clustering was performed using the IBM-Modeler Auto-Cluster. The resulting cluster validity was tested by multinomial logistic regression. The variables' validity for direct unsupervised clustering was compared with machine learning (ML) predictive models. <b>Results</b>: Five distinct subtypes were consistently identified: severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), mild age-related diabetes (MARD), and mild early-onset diabetes (MEOD). Using all five variables yielded the highest concordance between clustering methods. Concordance was strongest for SIRD and SIDD, reflecting their distinct clinical signatures in contrast to that in MARD, MOD and MEOD. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings support the robustness of clinically defined T2D subtypes and demonstrate the value of probabilistic clustering combined with ML for advancing precision diabetes care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186548
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appraisal of Clinical Explanatory Variables in Subtyping of Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Models

Stafny Dsouza, Riad Bayoumi, Mohammed Siddig, Costerwell Khyriem et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
article

Appraisal of Clinical Explanatory Variables in Subtyping of Type 2 Diabetes Using Machine Learning Models

Stafny Dsouza, Riad Bayoumi, Mohammed Siddig, Costerwell Khyriem, Amar Hassan Khamis, Fatima Sulaiman, Fatima Abdul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Clustering type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains a challenge due to its clinical heterogeneity and multifactorial nature. We aimed to evaluate the validity and robustness of the clinical variables in defining T2D subtypes using a discovery-to-prediction design. <b>Methods</b>: Five explanatory clinical aetiology variables (fasting serum insulin, fasting blood glucose, body mass index, age at diagnosis and HbA1c) were assessed for clustering T2D subtypes using two independent patient datasets. Clustering was performed using the IBM-Modeler Auto-Cluster. The resulting cluster validity was tested by multinomial logistic regression. The variables' validity for direct unsupervised clustering was compared with machine learning (ML) predictive models. <b>Results</b>: Five distinct subtypes were consistently identified: severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD), severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD), mild age-related diabetes (MARD), and mild early-onset diabetes (MEOD). Using all five variables yielded the highest concordance between clustering methods. Concordance was strongest for SIRD and SIDD, reflecting their distinct clinical signatures in contrast to that in MARD, MOD and MEOD. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings support the robustness of clinically defined T2D subtypes and demonstrate the value of probabilistic clustering combined with ML for advancing precision diabetes care.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(18)
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (AE), University of Gezira (SD)
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.