Theoretical Approach of Stability and Mechanical Properties in (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbTa, NbMo, MoTa) Refractory High-Entropy Alloys

The stability and mechanical properties of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbTa, NbMo, MoTa) refractory high-entropy alloys have been investigated by combining the first-principles with special quasi-random structure (SQS) method. It is found that with the increase in solute concentration x, the ΔHmix of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbMo, MoTa) linearly decreases, whereas both ΔHmix and ΔSmix of (TiZrHf)1−x(NbTa)x increase initially and subsequently decrease, with the crossover occurring at x = 0.56. The ΔHmix of (TiZrHf)1−x(NbTa)x and (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbMo, MoTa) alloys are larger and lower than that of TiZrHf, respectively, while the ΔSmix of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x is larger than that of TiZrHf. The formation possibility parameter Ω of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbMo, MoTa) first decreases sharply, followed by a gradual decrease. And the local lattice distortion (LLD) parameter δ remains relatively stable around x = 0.56 for all cases, after which it decreases sharply until x = 0.89. The δ value of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x is higher than that of TiZrHf for x < 0.56 but becomes lower beyond this composition. The valence electron concentration (VEC), a possible indicator for a single-phase solution, of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x increases nearly linearly, while the formation energy ΔHf of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x shows the opposite tendency, except for (TiZrHf)0.67(NbTa)0.33. Furthermore, the VEC of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x alloys increases, whereas their ΔHf decreases compared to that of TiZrHf. The ideal strength σp of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x increases linearly, reaching approximately 2.12 GPa. The bulk modulus (B), elastic modulus (E), and shear modulus (G) also exhibit linear increases, and their values in all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x alloys are higher than those of TiZrHf, with some exceptions. The Cauchy pressure (C12–C44) and Pugh’s ratio G/B of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x alloys increase, whereas the Poisson’s ratio ν exhibits the opposite trend. Moreover, the C12–C44 and G/B ratio of TiZrHf are lower and higher, respectively, than those of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x, and the ν of TiZrHf is lower than that of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x. This study provides valuable insights for the design of high-performance TiZrHf-based refractory high-entropy alloys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coatings
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15091092
Primary Topic
High Entropy Alloys Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical Approach of Stability and Mechanical Properties in (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbTa, NbMo, MoTa) Refractory High-Entropy Alloys

Hongge Yan, Yuanyuan Zhang, Heng Luo, Zixiong Ruan et al.
Coatings
High Entropy Alloys Studies
article

Theoretical Approach of Stability and Mechanical Properties in (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbTa, NbMo, MoTa) Refractory High-Entropy Alloys

Hongge Yan, Yuanyuan Zhang, Heng Luo, Zixiong Ruan, Te Hu, Touwen Fan
article en

Abstract

The stability and mechanical properties of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbTa, NbMo, MoTa) refractory high-entropy alloys have been investigated by combining the first-principles with special quasi-random structure (SQS) method. It is found that with the increase in solute concentration x, the ΔHmix of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbMo, MoTa) linearly decreases, whereas both ΔHmix and ΔSmix of (TiZrHf)1−x(NbTa)x increase initially and subsequently decrease, with the crossover occurring at x = 0.56. The ΔHmix of (TiZrHf)1−x(NbTa)x and (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbMo, MoTa) alloys are larger and lower than that of TiZrHf, respectively, while the ΔSmix of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x is larger than that of TiZrHf. The formation possibility parameter Ω of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x (AB = NbMo, MoTa) first decreases sharply, followed by a gradual decrease. And the local lattice distortion (LLD) parameter δ remains relatively stable around x = 0.56 for all cases, after which it decreases sharply until x = 0.89. The δ value of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x is higher than that of TiZrHf for x < 0.56 but becomes lower beyond this composition. The valence electron concentration (VEC), a possible indicator for a single-phase solution, of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x increases nearly linearly, while the formation energy ΔHf of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x shows the opposite tendency, except for (TiZrHf)0.67(NbTa)0.33. Furthermore, the VEC of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x alloys increases, whereas their ΔHf decreases compared to that of TiZrHf. The ideal strength σp of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x increases linearly, reaching approximately 2.12 GPa. The bulk modulus (B), elastic modulus (E), and shear modulus (G) also exhibit linear increases, and their values in all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x alloys are higher than those of TiZrHf, with some exceptions. The Cauchy pressure (C12–C44) and Pugh’s ratio G/B of all (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x alloys increase, whereas the Poisson’s ratio ν exhibits the opposite trend. Moreover, the C12–C44 and G/B ratio of TiZrHf are lower and higher, respectively, than those of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x, and the ν of TiZrHf is lower than that of (TiZrHf)1−x(AB)x. This study provides valuable insights for the design of high-performance TiZrHf-based refractory high-entropy alloys.

CoatingsVol. 15(9)
Foshan University (CN), Hunan University (CN), Institute of New Materials (CN), Hunan Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
High Entropy Alloys Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.