Communicating Results of a Critical Care Trial — A Survey of Participants and Family Members

Participants and their substitute decision-makers in a critical care trial who responded to our survey largely favored being informed of trial results, and they expressed understanding of the value of research, even when experimental interventions prove harmful. (Funded by the Lotte and John Hecht Foundation and the Canadian Critical Care Research Coordinators Group.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Evidence
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/evidoa2500056
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communicating Results of a Critical Care Trial — A Survey of Participants and Family Members

Diane Heels‐Ansdell, Marie-Hélène Masse, Annabelle Cumyn, Frédérick D’Aragon et al.
1 citations
NEJM Evidence
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
article

Communicating Results of a Critical Care Trial — A Survey of Participants and Family Members

Diane Heels‐Ansdell, Marie-Hélène Masse, Annabelle Cumyn, Frédérick D’Aragon, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Sheila Sprague, Michelle E. Kho, Julie Ménard, Dian Cohen, François Lamontagne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Participants and their substitute decision-makers in a critical care trial who responded to our survey largely favored being informed of trial results, and they expressed understanding of the value of research, even when experimental interventions prove harmful. (Funded by the Lotte and John Hecht Foundation and the Canadian Critical Care Research Coordinators Group.).

NEJM EvidenceVol. 4(10)
Bishop's University (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Bow Valley College (CA), Population Health Research Institute (CA), Addiction Research Foundation (US), Impact (CA), St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.