Cognitive Motivation and Epistemological Beliefs among University of Anbar Students: Gender and Discipline Differences

This study investigated the predictive role of cognitive motivation in shaping epistemological beliefs among University of Anbar students and examined gender and disciplinary differences. A stratified random sample of 400 undergraduates (149 males, 251 females; 228 scientific, 172 humanities) participated during the 2022–2023 academic year. Two researcher-developed scales measured cognitive motivation and epistemological beliefs, with established face and construct validity and acceptable reliability. Multiple regression analysis showed that cognitive motivation negatively predicted epistemological beliefs (β = –0.179, t = –3.126, p <.05). Significant gender differences emerged across all cognitive-motivation dimensions except learning orientation, favoring males. Scientific-discipline students demonstrated higher cognitive motivation than their humanities counterparts. Epistemological beliefs were largely consistent across gender and discipline, except that males and scientific students scored higher on the “speed of knowledge acquisition” dimension, whereas humanities students scored higher on “source of knowledge.” These findings underscore the need for educators to foster accurate epistemological beliefs and to cultivate cognitive-motivation skills that help students navigate complex academic and real-life problems. Enhancing these attributes may improve students’ ability to interpret and construct knowledge within sound cognitive frameworks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63132/ati.2025.mental.2447
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Motivation and Epistemological Beliefs among University of Anbar Students: Gender and Discipline Differences

Muhammad Al-Ani, Mohammed Alheety, Shaymaa Al-Shuwaikh
Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Cognitive Motivation and Epistemological Beliefs among University of Anbar Students: Gender and Discipline Differences

Muhammad Al-Ani, Mohammed Alheety, Shaymaa Al-Shuwaikh
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the predictive role of cognitive motivation in shaping epistemological beliefs among University of Anbar students and examined gender and disciplinary differences. A stratified random sample of 400 undergraduates (149 males, 251 females; 228 scientific, 172 humanities) participated during the 2022–2023 academic year. Two researcher-developed scales measured cognitive motivation and epistemological beliefs, with established face and construct validity and acceptable reliability. Multiple regression analysis showed that cognitive motivation negatively predicted epistemological beliefs (β = –0.179, t = –3.126, p <.05). Significant gender differences emerged across all cognitive-motivation dimensions except learning orientation, favoring males. Scientific-discipline students demonstrated higher cognitive motivation than their humanities counterparts. Epistemological beliefs were largely consistent across gender and discipline, except that males and scientific students scored higher on the “speed of knowledge acquisition” dimension, whereas humanities students scored higher on “source of knowledge.” These findings underscore the need for educators to foster accurate epistemological beliefs and to cultivate cognitive-motivation skills that help students navigate complex academic and real-life problems. Enhancing these attributes may improve students’ ability to interpret and construct knowledge within sound cognitive frameworks.

Dragoman Journal of Translation Studies(22)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.