“Fake is not a strategy for you”: Unpacking expectations of authenticity for women political candidates

Authenticity has been studied from multiple perspectives within public relations. Yet, little research explores authenticity as it relates to the communication practices and expectations of women seeking political office. Grounded in the work on political authenticity (Luebke, 2021), this ethnographic project focused on how women candidates perceive authenticity as part of their campaign strategy. Women, particularly women of color, may not feel like they can be authentic to themselves and consistent with expectations developed based on candidates whom they do not look like or sound like, creating an authenticity paradox. For women candidates, especially at a local level, authenticity in action may feel more demonstrable, less manufactured, and more in alignment with self, resolving some of the tensions inherent in a typically male-dominated arena and allowing for greater vulnerability. As such, we propose reconsidering running for office through the lens of authentic community engagement, drawing upon Johnston and Lane’s (2019) Authenticity Matrix, which focuses on respecting diverse perspectives, ensuring feedback loops, providing space for community voices, and investing relationally. • Behind-the-scenes ethnographic view of a political training program for women. • Authenticity for women political trainees was found in action. • Authenticity must include an internal alignment with self. • Authenticity requires vulnerability. • Authenticity Matrix can assist political candidates in authentic communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Review
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102634
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Fake is not a strategy for you”: Unpacking expectations of authenticity for women political candidates

Stephanie Madden, Abbey Blake Levenshus
1 citations
Public Relations Review
Gender Politics and Representation
3.87
article

“Fake is not a strategy for you”: Unpacking expectations of authenticity for women political candidates

Stephanie Madden, Abbey Blake Levenshus
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Authenticity has been studied from multiple perspectives within public relations. Yet, little research explores authenticity as it relates to the communication practices and expectations of women seeking political office. Grounded in the work on political authenticity (Luebke, 2021), this ethnographic project focused on how women candidates perceive authenticity as part of their campaign strategy. Women, particularly women of color, may not feel like they can be authentic to themselves and consistent with expectations developed based on candidates whom they do not look like or sound like, creating an authenticity paradox. For women candidates, especially at a local level, authenticity in action may feel more demonstrable, less manufactured, and more in alignment with self, resolving some of the tensions inherent in a typically male-dominated arena and allowing for greater vulnerability. As such, we propose reconsidering running for office through the lens of authentic community engagement, drawing upon Johnston and Lane’s (2019) Authenticity Matrix, which focuses on respecting diverse perspectives, ensuring feedback loops, providing space for community voices, and investing relationally. • Behind-the-scenes ethnographic view of a political training program for women. • Authenticity for women political trainees was found in action. • Authenticity must include an internal alignment with self. • Authenticity requires vulnerability. • Authenticity Matrix can assist political candidates in authentic communication.

Public Relations ReviewVol. 51(5)
Butler University (US), Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gender Politics and Representation
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.