The role of co-benefits in motivating climate change mitigation – Experimental evidence

We study the role of co-benefits - positive effects of climate change mitigation projects in addition to CO2 reduction - in motivating individuals to donate to such projects. In two artefactual field experiments conducted with large population samples (n = 2400 in total), we test how the existence and specific nature of co-benefits affect donations. In both experiments, we find that co-benefits have a positive impact on participants' willingness to donate. Moreover, our second experiment shows that contributions respond to the nature of co-benefits, and these responses seem to be driven by individuals' preferences for specific types of co-benefits. We further observe that co-benefits also increase donations when making carbon footprints and thus individual responsibility for environmental externalities more salient. In sum, our study provides a comprehensive picture of the potential of co-benefits for increasing donations to climate change mitigation projects and has several implications for the provision of co-benefits information in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108783
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of co-benefits in motivating climate change mitigation – Experimental evidence

Andreas Löschel, Christoph Feldhaus, Peter Werner, Marvin Gleue
1 citations
Ecological Economics
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

The role of co-benefits in motivating climate change mitigation – Experimental evidence

Andreas Löschel, Christoph Feldhaus, Peter Werner, Marvin Gleue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We study the role of co-benefits - positive effects of climate change mitigation projects in addition to CO2 reduction - in motivating individuals to donate to such projects. In two artefactual field experiments conducted with large population samples (n = 2400 in total), we test how the existence and specific nature of co-benefits affect donations. In both experiments, we find that co-benefits have a positive impact on participants' willingness to donate. Moreover, our second experiment shows that contributions respond to the nature of co-benefits, and these responses seem to be driven by individuals' preferences for specific types of co-benefits. We further observe that co-benefits also increase donations when making carbon footprints and thus individual responsibility for environmental externalities more salient. In sum, our study provides a comprehensive picture of the potential of co-benefits for increasing donations to climate change mitigation projects and has several implications for the provision of co-benefits information in practice.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 239
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.