The differential effects of algorithmic recommendations on user experience: Enjoyment and serendipity in everyday music streaming

The rise of music streaming services such as Spotify has transformed music listening behavior. Most prominently, online recommender systems foster highly individualized exposure to content and substantially shape user experience (UX). Yet, no research so far has investigated whether good or bad UX in the context of algorithmically curated music listening may be attributed to the actual functions of the algorithm (i.e., prevalence of personalized suggestions), users’ perceptions of the algorithm (i.e., interface transparency; individual perception and general algorithmic awareness), or both. In the present study, we attempt to separate these components of algorithmic curation by exploring their differential effects on users’ experience of enjoyment and serendipity. We employed a linkage design within which we combined data collected through the experience sampling method with digital trace data about the listening behavior of participants collected through the Spotify API. We recruited 144 participants, resulting in T = 6,920 situational measurement occasions, of which 40% (t = 2,786) were preceded by a Spotify listening session. We find that sessions characterized by more algorithmic curation were enjoyed less. This finding emerged both for the objectively measured prevalence of algorithmic curation (with and without interface cues signaling the presence of algorithmic curation) and for users’ subjective perception of algorithmic curation. Furthermore, sessions with a higher prevalence of algorithmic curation were perceived as more novel and unexpected. This novelty, however, was evaluated more positively only by users with a high awareness for automated decision-making in situations in which Spotify's interface provided them with cues about the algorithm's presence. These findings indicate that algorithmic recommendations may not always contribute to better UX but can be beneficial in specific use cases such as content discovery, yet only if users are aware that they are interacting with an algorithm and these interactions are in line with their goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3749012.3749040
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The differential effects of algorithmic recommendations on user experience: Enjoyment and serendipity in everyday music streaming

Rebekka Kreling, Alicia Gilbert, Michael Scharkow, Leonard Reinecke et al.
Media Influence and Health
article

The differential effects of algorithmic recommendations on user experience: Enjoyment and serendipity in everyday music streaming

Rebekka Kreling, Alicia Gilbert, Michael Scharkow, Leonard Reinecke, Felix Dietrich, Alicia Ernst, Benedikt Rohr
article en

Abstract

The rise of music streaming services such as Spotify has transformed music listening behavior. Most prominently, online recommender systems foster highly individualized exposure to content and substantially shape user experience (UX). Yet, no research so far has investigated whether good or bad UX in the context of algorithmically curated music listening may be attributed to the actual functions of the algorithm (i.e., prevalence of personalized suggestions), users’ perceptions of the algorithm (i.e., interface transparency; individual perception and general algorithmic awareness), or both. In the present study, we attempt to separate these components of algorithmic curation by exploring their differential effects on users’ experience of enjoyment and serendipity. We employed a linkage design within which we combined data collected through the experience sampling method with digital trace data about the listening behavior of participants collected through the Spotify API. We recruited 144 participants, resulting in T = 6,920 situational measurement occasions, of which 40% (t = 2,786) were preceded by a Spotify listening session. We find that sessions characterized by more algorithmic curation were enjoyed less. This finding emerged both for the objectively measured prevalence of algorithmic curation (with and without interface cues signaling the presence of algorithmic curation) and for users’ subjective perception of algorithmic curation. Furthermore, sessions with a higher prevalence of algorithmic curation were perceived as more novel and unexpected. This novelty, however, was evaluated more positively only by users with a high awareness for automated decision-making in situations in which Spotify's interface provided them with cues about the algorithm's presence. These findings indicate that algorithmic recommendations may not always contribute to better UX but can be beneficial in specific use cases such as content discovery, yet only if users are aware that they are interacting with an algorithm and these interactions are in line with their goals.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.