More-than-a-prediction: reframing AI's role in more-than-human design of interactions

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into design processes and presented as a predictive or generative partner. Within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), this role can extend into co-design contexts. Yet in more-than-human and multispecies design, using such tools would risk the reinforcement of anthropocentric biases and obscure non-human perspectives. This paper aims to challenge the narratives of AI as a co-design agent and instead propose a reframing of AI as a reflective companion that aids designers by exposing ethical blind spots, checking for human-centred biases, and encouraging the critical reflection of designers. Applying the BACT framework (Beings, Activities, Context, Technologies), initially developed for multispecies design, we suggest how AI systems can be trained to use such structures to enable post-design reflection. In this reframing, BACT is a template for how existing design tools can be used to guide AI towards more inclusive and ethically aware analysis. Instead of providing solutions, AI is a prompt towards a path to more reflective, multispecies-sensitive design practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3749012.3749042
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More-than-a-prediction: reframing AI's role in more-than-human design of interactions

Modestos Stavrakis, Helen Charoupia
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

More-than-a-prediction: reframing AI's role in more-than-human design of interactions

Modestos Stavrakis, Helen Charoupia
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into design processes and presented as a predictive or generative partner. Within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), this role can extend into co-design contexts. Yet in more-than-human and multispecies design, using such tools would risk the reinforcement of anthropocentric biases and obscure non-human perspectives. This paper aims to challenge the narratives of AI as a co-design agent and instead propose a reframing of AI as a reflective companion that aids designers by exposing ethical blind spots, checking for human-centred biases, and encouraging the critical reflection of designers. Applying the BACT framework (Beings, Activities, Context, Technologies), initially developed for multispecies design, we suggest how AI systems can be trained to use such structures to enable post-design reflection. In this reframing, BACT is a template for how existing design tools can be used to guide AI towards more inclusive and ethically aware analysis. Instead of providing solutions, AI is a prompt towards a path to more reflective, multispecies-sensitive design practices.

University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

More-than-a-prediction: reframing AI's role in more-than-human design of interactions — Modestos Stavrakis, Helen Charoupia · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS