Energetic value of Arctic forage-sized fish with implications for a nearshore seabird predator

Abstract Arctic cod ( Boreogadus saida , also called polar cod) are considered the single most important Arctic forage fish due to their high abundance and nutritional quality. Because Arctic cod are strongly ice associated and prefer colder waters, their frequency in coastal waters has declined with warming, decreasing availability to nearshore predators. To consider the nutritional quality of alternative prey, we measured energy density and estimated whole-body energy of forage-size (39–200 mm) fishes collected during summers 2021–2023 ( n = 274). The fishes sampled included 16 potential prey species from Foggy Island Bay (70.3°N, 147.5°W, near Prudhoe Bay) and Lion Bay (70.2°N, 146.4°W, near Flaxman Island), northern Alaska. Dry weight energy densities ranged from 16.2 to 27.5 kJ g -1 (mean ± SD = 22.0 ± 1.73 kJ g -1 , n = 274) across individuals. Of common species, Arctic cod had the highest mean energy density (24.3 ± 1.1 kJ g -1 , n = 25) and fourhorn sculpin ( Myoxocephalus quadricornis ) had the lowest (19.7 ± 0.8 kJ g -1 , n = 20). To account for size differences among prey species, whole-body energy of typical fish sizes available to predators were modeled using whole-body energy to length relationships and length distributions. Juvenile salmonids (e.g., ciscoes and whitefishes) provided the most energy per individual and were four-fold greater than smaller-bodied Arctic cod. Predators that consume juvenile ciscoes and whitefishes may be more resilient to declines in Arctic cod availability than predators with smaller gapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Biology
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-025-04705-5
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energetic value of Arctic forage-sized fish with implications for a nearshore seabird predator

Kenneth H. Dunton, Brian D. Uher‐Koch, Ashley E. Stanek, Vanessa R. von Biela
Marine Biology
Marine and fisheries research
article

Energetic value of Arctic forage-sized fish with implications for a nearshore seabird predator

Kenneth H. Dunton, Brian D. Uher‐Koch, Ashley E. Stanek, Vanessa R. von Biela
article en

Abstract

Abstract Arctic cod ( Boreogadus saida , also called polar cod) are considered the single most important Arctic forage fish due to their high abundance and nutritional quality. Because Arctic cod are strongly ice associated and prefer colder waters, their frequency in coastal waters has declined with warming, decreasing availability to nearshore predators. To consider the nutritional quality of alternative prey, we measured energy density and estimated whole-body energy of forage-size (39–200 mm) fishes collected during summers 2021–2023 ( n = 274). The fishes sampled included 16 potential prey species from Foggy Island Bay (70.3°N, 147.5°W, near Prudhoe Bay) and Lion Bay (70.2°N, 146.4°W, near Flaxman Island), northern Alaska. Dry weight energy densities ranged from 16.2 to 27.5 kJ g -1 (mean ± SD = 22.0 ± 1.73 kJ g -1 , n = 274) across individuals. Of common species, Arctic cod had the highest mean energy density (24.3 ± 1.1 kJ g -1 , n = 25) and fourhorn sculpin ( Myoxocephalus quadricornis ) had the lowest (19.7 ± 0.8 kJ g -1 , n = 20). To account for size differences among prey species, whole-body energy of typical fish sizes available to predators were modeled using whole-body energy to length relationships and length distributions. Juvenile salmonids (e.g., ciscoes and whitefishes) provided the most energy per individual and were four-fold greater than smaller-bodied Arctic cod. Predators that consume juvenile ciscoes and whitefishes may be more resilient to declines in Arctic cod availability than predators with smaller gapes.

Marine BiologyVol. 172(10)
United States Geological Survey (US), U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center
National Science Foundation, U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energetic value of Arctic forage-sized fish with implications for a nearshore seabird predator — Kenneth H. Dunton, Brian D. Uher‐Koch, et al. · Marine Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS