State, society, and market: Interpreting the norms and dynamics of China's AI governance

This study challenges the prevailing perception of China's AI governance as a monolithic, state-driven model and instead presents a nuanced analysis of its complex governance landscape. Utilizing governance theories, we develop an analytical framework examining key governing nodes, tools, actors, and norms. Through case studies on minor protection and content regulation, this study demonstrates that Chinese AI governance involves a diverse array of stakeholders—including the state, private sector, and society—who co-produce norms and regulatory mechanisms. Contrary to conventional narratives, China's governance approach adapts existing regulatory tools to meet new challenges, balancing political, social, and economic interests. This study highlights how China has rapidly formalized AI regulations, in areas such as minor protection and content regulation, setting a precedent in global AI governance. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of AI regulation beyond ideological binaries and offer insights relevant to international AI policy discussions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer law & security review
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106206
Citations
4
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State, society, and market: Interpreting the norms and dynamics of China's AI governance

Xuechen Chen, Lu Xu
4 citations
Computer law & security review
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
34.09
article

State, society, and market: Interpreting the norms and dynamics of China's AI governance

Xuechen Chen, Lu Xu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study challenges the prevailing perception of China's AI governance as a monolithic, state-driven model and instead presents a nuanced analysis of its complex governance landscape. Utilizing governance theories, we develop an analytical framework examining key governing nodes, tools, actors, and norms. Through case studies on minor protection and content regulation, this study demonstrates that Chinese AI governance involves a diverse array of stakeholders—including the state, private sector, and society—who co-produce norms and regulatory mechanisms. Contrary to conventional narratives, China's governance approach adapts existing regulatory tools to meet new challenges, balancing political, social, and economic interests. This study highlights how China has rapidly formalized AI regulations, in areas such as minor protection and content regulation, setting a precedent in global AI governance. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of AI regulation beyond ideological binaries and offer insights relevant to international AI policy discussions.

Computer law & security reviewVol. 59
Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
34.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.