Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing: A Case Study of STEM Undergraduates

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly tools such as ChatGPT, has introduced new complexities into the teaching and learning of academic writing. For students in STEM disciplines, who often regard writing as a secondary skill compared to technical expertise, AI offers unprecedented support in grammar, vocabulary, and organization. Yet, it simultaneously raises concerns related to authenticity, critical engagement, and academic honesty. This article presents findings from a mixed-methods study conducted with undergraduate STEM students enrolled in composition courses at San Diego State University Georgia. By combining textual analysis of student assignments with reflective surveys, the study identifies both opportunities and risks associated with AI-assisted writing. Results reveal improvements in surface-level accuracy, vocabulary range, and time management, counterbalanced by challenges in synthesis, overreliance on automated support, and instances of fabricated references. The study argues for a reimagined pedagogy that integrates AI not as a substitute for student thinking but as a scaffold for deeper engagement, fostering reflective practice, ethical awareness, and sustainable autonomy in writing development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.04942
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing: A Case Study of STEM Undergraduates

Nino Jojua
British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing: A Case Study of STEM Undergraduates

Nino Jojua
article en

Abstract

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly tools such as ChatGPT, has introduced new complexities into the teaching and learning of academic writing. For students in STEM disciplines, who often regard writing as a secondary skill compared to technical expertise, AI offers unprecedented support in grammar, vocabulary, and organization. Yet, it simultaneously raises concerns related to authenticity, critical engagement, and academic honesty. This article presents findings from a mixed-methods study conducted with undergraduate STEM students enrolled in composition courses at San Diego State University Georgia. By combining textual analysis of student assignments with reflective surveys, the study identifies both opportunities and risks associated with AI-assisted writing. Results reveal improvements in surface-level accuracy, vocabulary range, and time management, counterbalanced by challenges in synthesis, overreliance on automated support, and instances of fabricated references. The study argues for a reimagined pedagogy that integrates AI not as a substitute for student thinking but as a scaffold for deeper engagement, fostering reflective practice, ethical awareness, and sustainable autonomy in writing development.

British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced StudiesVol. 6(5)
San Diego State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.