Building a Safe and Transparent Workflow for Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Clinical Trials and Prediction Models: A Technical Report

The use of large language models (LLMs) in clinical trials and prediction models is expanding rapidly, offering opportunities for efficiency but also raising concerns about privacy, fairness, accuracy, and accountability. This technical report proposes a structured workflow to support research teams in adopting LLMs while preserving scientific standards and public trust. The workflow is organized into seven sequential steps: (i) scope definition and governance, (ii) retrieval-augmented literature review, (iii) model evaluation and benchmarking, (iv) documentation and audit trail, (v) expert quality gates, (vi) manuscript disclosure, and (vii) privacy and security safeguards. To facilitate adoption, we provide reusable checklists that map study types to relevant international reporting guidelines, including Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Artificial Intelligence (CONSORT-AI), Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials - Artificial Intelligence (SPIRIT-AI), Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis - Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of Decision - Support Systems Driven by Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI). The framework is designed to mitigate risks such as fabricated citations, biased outputs from skewed datasets, and over-reliance on automated text. Rather than replacing human reasoning, it aims to augment it, offering greater speed while maintaining accountability, reproducibility, and transparency. By combining governance rules, technical safeguards, and human oversight, this workflow provides a practical and auditable path for integrating LLMs into clinical trials and prediction models without eroding confidence in scientific work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92571
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a Safe and Transparent Workflow for Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Clinical Trials and Prediction Models: A Technical Report

J. Frutuoso
Cureus
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Building a Safe and Transparent Workflow for Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Clinical Trials and Prediction Models: A Technical Report

J. Frutuoso
article en

Abstract

The use of large language models (LLMs) in clinical trials and prediction models is expanding rapidly, offering opportunities for efficiency but also raising concerns about privacy, fairness, accuracy, and accountability. This technical report proposes a structured workflow to support research teams in adopting LLMs while preserving scientific standards and public trust. The workflow is organized into seven sequential steps: (i) scope definition and governance, (ii) retrieval-augmented literature review, (iii) model evaluation and benchmarking, (iv) documentation and audit trail, (v) expert quality gates, (vi) manuscript disclosure, and (vii) privacy and security safeguards. To facilitate adoption, we provide reusable checklists that map study types to relevant international reporting guidelines, including Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials - Artificial Intelligence (CONSORT-AI), Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials - Artificial Intelligence (SPIRIT-AI), Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis - Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of Decision - Support Systems Driven by Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI). The framework is designed to mitigate risks such as fabricated citations, biased outputs from skewed datasets, and over-reliance on automated text. Rather than replacing human reasoning, it aims to augment it, offering greater speed while maintaining accountability, reproducibility, and transparency. By combining governance rules, technical safeguards, and human oversight, this workflow provides a practical and auditable path for integrating LLMs into clinical trials and prediction models without eroding confidence in scientific work.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental (PT), Ordem dos Médicos (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.