When Robots Say Sorry in High-Stake Environment: Emotional Connection Might Matter More Than Explanations

Robotic systems are rapidly expanding their operational domains, venturing into scenarios where they collaborate with humans to accomplish a diverse range of tasks from routine functions to high-risk undertakings. As HumanRobot Interaction (HRI) researchers strive to enhance the autonomous capabilities of robots in assisting humans with risky missions, fostering trust in these advanced systems becomes an indispensable prerequisite. Investigating the conditions that shape an individual's decision to trust or distrust a robot in high-risk, time-critical situations is a crucial step toward developing reliable and acceptable robotic assistants for emergency response. In this study, we explored the role of different types of apologies (explanatory, emotional, and no apology) in trust repair within high-risk environments. Our results indicate that emotional apologies demonstrate significant effects in restoring trust after violations, particularly in terms of trust propensity and trust repair. Lastly, we identify research implications and future directions for developing more effective apology structures in human-robot teaming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ichms65439.2025.11154364
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Robots Say Sorry in High-Stake Environment: Emotional Connection Might Matter More Than Explanations

Liang Tang, Masooda Bashir
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

When Robots Say Sorry in High-Stake Environment: Emotional Connection Might Matter More Than Explanations

Liang Tang, Masooda Bashir
article en

Abstract

Robotic systems are rapidly expanding their operational domains, venturing into scenarios where they collaborate with humans to accomplish a diverse range of tasks from routine functions to high-risk undertakings. As HumanRobot Interaction (HRI) researchers strive to enhance the autonomous capabilities of robots in assisting humans with risky missions, fostering trust in these advanced systems becomes an indispensable prerequisite. Investigating the conditions that shape an individual's decision to trust or distrust a robot in high-risk, time-critical situations is a crucial step toward developing reliable and acceptable robotic assistants for emergency response. In this study, we explored the role of different types of apologies (explanatory, emotional, and no apology) in trust repair within high-risk environments. Our results indicate that emotional apologies demonstrate significant effects in restoring trust after violations, particularly in terms of trust propensity and trust repair. Lastly, we identify research implications and future directions for developing more effective apology structures in human-robot teaming.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.