What Goals Drive Employees’ Information Systems Security Behaviors? A Mixed Methods Study of Employees’ Goals in the Workplace

IT security remains high on the agenda of CIOs, with employees’ adoption of security behaviors—behaviors that employees adopt to protect organizational IT assets—being a top concern. To explain when employees adopt security behaviors, the information systems security (ISec) literature has mainly employed deductive studies that draw on theory-based assumptions about goals—mostly from behavioral theories used in criminology and public health (e.g., avoiding sanctions, avoiding harm from threats, avoiding disapproval and blame). However, as these theories typically do not theorize about employees’ goals specific to the workplace, they offer limited insights into the goals that employees pursue at work. Subsequently, not much is known about the goals that motivate employees’ security behaviors at work. Against this backdrop, this research provides a complementary, inductive-first inquiry into the work-related goals that drive employees’ security behaviors. Using a qualitative-quantitative mixed methods research design, we identify four goals (Study 1) and evaluate their importance for predicting employee security behaviors (Study 2). Overall, we find evidence that employees’ work performance and blame avoidance goals are the most salient predictors of security behaviors; as a result, our findings suggest that employees engage in security behaviors primarily because they believe it will help them meet supervisors’ expectations—a key goal that has been largely ignored in the previous ISec literature.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00950
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Goals Drive Employees’ Information Systems Security Behaviors? A Mixed Methods Study of Employees’ Goals in the Workplace

Sebastian Schuetz, Jason Bennett Thatcher, Allen C. Johnston, Heiko Gewald
1 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
article

What Goals Drive Employees’ Information Systems Security Behaviors? A Mixed Methods Study of Employees’ Goals in the Workplace

Sebastian Schuetz, Jason Bennett Thatcher, Allen C. Johnston, Heiko Gewald
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IT security remains high on the agenda of CIOs, with employees’ adoption of security behaviors—behaviors that employees adopt to protect organizational IT assets—being a top concern. To explain when employees adopt security behaviors, the information systems security (ISec) literature has mainly employed deductive studies that draw on theory-based assumptions about goals—mostly from behavioral theories used in criminology and public health (e.g., avoiding sanctions, avoiding harm from threats, avoiding disapproval and blame). However, as these theories typically do not theorize about employees’ goals specific to the workplace, they offer limited insights into the goals that employees pursue at work. Subsequently, not much is known about the goals that motivate employees’ security behaviors at work. Against this backdrop, this research provides a complementary, inductive-first inquiry into the work-related goals that drive employees’ security behaviors. Using a qualitative-quantitative mixed methods research design, we identify four goals (Study 1) and evaluate their importance for predicting employee security behaviors (Study 2). Overall, we find evidence that employees’ work performance and blame avoidance goals are the most salient predictors of security behaviors; as a result, our findings suggest that employees engage in security behaviors primarily because they believe it will help them meet supervisors’ expectations—a key goal that has been largely ignored in the previous ISec literature.

Journal of the Association for Information SystemsVol. 26(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.