Decision-Centric Uncertainty Sets for Storage Arbitrage: Integrating Estimation and Optimization

Traditional uncertainty optimization methods employ a two-stage paradigm that separates uncertainty estimation from decision-making, often yielding suboptimal solutions. To address this issue, this letter proposes a decision-centric uncertainty set approach for risk-averse storage arbitrage, which integrates estimation and optimization through a tailored decision-centric gradient based on the implicit function theorem and a statistically valid size calibration method. The proposed framework achieves 35.1% higher profitability than robust optimization (RO) and 12.2% higher than distributionally robust optimization (DRO), while ensuring the desired risk coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2025.3611152
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-Centric Uncertainty Sets for Storage Arbitrage: Integrating Estimation and Optimization

Yinliang Xu, Jeremy D. Watson, Jinfeng Wang, Jian Song et al.
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Decision-Centric Uncertainty Sets for Storage Arbitrage: Integrating Estimation and Optimization

Yinliang Xu, Jeremy D. Watson, Jinfeng Wang, Jian Song, Hongbin Sun, Jie Zhu
article en

Abstract

Traditional uncertainty optimization methods employ a two-stage paradigm that separates uncertainty estimation from decision-making, often yielding suboptimal solutions. To address this issue, this letter proposes a decision-centric uncertainty set approach for risk-averse storage arbitrage, which integrates estimation and optimization through a tailored decision-centric gradient based on the implicit function theorem and a statistically valid size calibration method. The proposed framework achieves 35.1% higher profitability than robust optimization (RO) and 12.2% higher than distributionally robust optimization (DRO), while ensuring the desired risk coverage.

IEEE Transactions on Power SystemsVol. 40(6)
University of Canterbury (NZ), Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), China Southern Power Grid (China) (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.