Recovery of benthic macroinfauna six years after dredging

In soft-sediment communities, benthic macroinfauna can recover quickly (sometimes < 1 year) from dredging. However, it's unclear how recovery is influenced if dredging dramatically changes abiotic factors. We determined recovery of benthic macroinfauna from dredging on a sandy shoal (Ship Shoal, Louisiana, USA), six years after dredging. Because the dredged area infilled with mud instead of sand and changed local abiotic conditions, we hypothesized that the benthic community had not recovered. Our results support this hypothesis. Although the dredged community had, on average, 160% greater density and 170% greater macroinfaunal biomass than the reference community, these increases were driven by the opportunistic and seasonally variable dwarf clam, Mulinia lateralis. Community structure differed starkly between the regions. Haustoriid amphipods and amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae) dominated the reference community. However, these taxa were largely absent from the dredged community, which was dominated by opportunistic species such as M. lateralis and the fringe-gilled mudworm Paraprionospio pinnata. Community differences were largely driven by bottom-water dissolved oxygen and sediment grain size. Our results suggest that the dredged areas are still in a transitional phase of recovery after six years - dominated by opportunistic, hypoxia-tolerant species. Our results suggest that abiotic factors such as grain size and hypoxia are important in structuring benthic communities and their recovery rates. Thus, to achieve faster recovery of the biological community, dredging should be conducted in a way that minimizes long-term impacts on abiotic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recovery of benthic macroinfauna six years after dredging

Emelie M. Foster, Kehui Xu, Adam Gartelman, David Samuel Johnson et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
1.79
article

Recovery of benthic macroinfauna six years after dredging

Emelie M. Foster, Kehui Xu, Adam Gartelman, David Samuel Johnson, Attila Németh, Stacy Calhoun, Manisha Pant, Brian Roberts, James M. Nelson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In soft-sediment communities, benthic macroinfauna can recover quickly (sometimes < 1 year) from dredging. However, it's unclear how recovery is influenced if dredging dramatically changes abiotic factors. We determined recovery of benthic macroinfauna from dredging on a sandy shoal (Ship Shoal, Louisiana, USA), six years after dredging. Because the dredged area infilled with mud instead of sand and changed local abiotic conditions, we hypothesized that the benthic community had not recovered. Our results support this hypothesis. Although the dredged community had, on average, 160% greater density and 170% greater macroinfaunal biomass than the reference community, these increases were driven by the opportunistic and seasonally variable dwarf clam, Mulinia lateralis. Community structure differed starkly between the regions. Haustoriid amphipods and amphioxus (Branchiostoma floridae) dominated the reference community. However, these taxa were largely absent from the dredged community, which was dominated by opportunistic species such as M. lateralis and the fringe-gilled mudworm Paraprionospio pinnata. Community differences were largely driven by bottom-water dissolved oxygen and sediment grain size. Our results suggest that the dredged areas are still in a transitional phase of recovery after six years - dominated by opportunistic, hypoxia-tolerant species. Our results suggest that abiotic factors such as grain size and hypoxia are important in structuring benthic communities and their recovery rates. Thus, to achieve faster recovery of the biological community, dredging should be conducted in a way that minimizes long-term impacts on abiotic conditions.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Louisiana State University (US), William & Mary (US), University of Georgia (US), Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Marine Biology and Ecology Research
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.