Personalized education approach based on cognitive psychology for endoscopic diagnosis: A multicenter randomized trial

The learning curve for endoscopic diagnosis varies, and an optimal educational strategy is not available. Working memory (WM) refers to an individual's ability to store and process information quickly and simultaneously. This study aimed to determine whether educational methods, optimized by individual WM, facilitate learning about endoscopic diagnoses. In the development phase, the standard WM profile for general endoscopists was determined by 79 endoscopists. In the validation phase, 60 trainees from four Japanese institutions were assessed for visuospatial or verbal WM dominance, based on the standard WM profile, and randomly assigned to receive matched (Matched-E group) or unmatched (Unmatched-E group) education. In the Matched-E group, the visuospatial and verbal WM-dominant trainees learned the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps by pattern recognition and through the description text of narrow-band imaging classification, respectively. In the Unmatched-E group, participants received education that was opposite to their dominant WM type. The diagnostic accuracy of the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps was compared between the groups after each educational session. Among the 60 trainees, 40 (21 in Matched-E and 19 in Unmatched-E) completed the validation test. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the Matched-E group than that in the Unmatched-E group (61.6% vs. 53.9%, P = 0.008). The diagnostic accuracy for non-neoplastic lesions was higher in the Matched-E group than that in the Unmatched-E group (68.0% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.002), whereas it did not differ for adenoma, intramucosal cancer, or invasive cancer. The personalized education based on the WM profile facilitated learning endoscopic diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332708
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalized education approach based on cognitive psychology for endoscopic diagnosis: A multicenter randomized trial

Mitsuru Esaki, Kentaro Mochida, Masao Okubo, Ryu Tanaka et al.
PLoS ONE
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Personalized education approach based on cognitive psychology for endoscopic diagnosis: A multicenter randomized trial

Mitsuru Esaki, Kentaro Mochida, Masao Okubo, Ryu Tanaka, Daisuke Suto, Jun Arimoto, Mikinori Kataoka, Takuji Gotoda, Chika Kusano, Kenichi Konda, Toshihiro Nishizawa, Mizuki Nagai, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Sho Suzuki, Kazuma Fujimoto, Kohei Yamanouchi, Yasunari Sakamoto, Masamichi Yuzawa, Tomohiro Kawakami
article en

Abstract

The learning curve for endoscopic diagnosis varies, and an optimal educational strategy is not available. Working memory (WM) refers to an individual's ability to store and process information quickly and simultaneously. This study aimed to determine whether educational methods, optimized by individual WM, facilitate learning about endoscopic diagnoses. In the development phase, the standard WM profile for general endoscopists was determined by 79 endoscopists. In the validation phase, 60 trainees from four Japanese institutions were assessed for visuospatial or verbal WM dominance, based on the standard WM profile, and randomly assigned to receive matched (Matched-E group) or unmatched (Unmatched-E group) education. In the Matched-E group, the visuospatial and verbal WM-dominant trainees learned the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps by pattern recognition and through the description text of narrow-band imaging classification, respectively. In the Unmatched-E group, participants received education that was opposite to their dominant WM type. The diagnostic accuracy of the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps was compared between the groups after each educational session. Among the 60 trainees, 40 (21 in Matched-E and 19 in Unmatched-E) completed the validation test. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the Matched-E group than that in the Unmatched-E group (61.6% vs. 53.9%, P = 0.008). The diagnostic accuracy for non-neoplastic lesions was higher in the Matched-E group than that in the Unmatched-E group (68.0% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.002), whereas it did not differ for adenoma, intramucosal cancer, or invasive cancer. The personalized education based on the WM profile facilitated learning endoscopic diagnosis.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Nihon University (JP), Hiroshima University (JP), SHOWA Medical University (JP), Kyushu University (JP), Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases (US), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), International University Of Health And Welfare Atami Hospital (JP), Mita Hospital (JP), Shirasagi Hospital (JP), Sanno Medical Center (JP), Kitasato University (JP), International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.