Transaction Fairness in Blockchains, Revisited

With the growing number of decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, transaction fairness in blockchains has gained much research interest. As a broad concept in distributed systems and blockchains, fairness has been used in different contexts, varying from ones related to the liveness of the system to ones that focus on the received order of transactions. In this work, we revisit the fairness definitions and find that existing fairness definitions are not adapted to blockchains with multiple DApps. We then provide a more generic one called <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">verifiable fairness</i>. Compared with prior definitions, our notion has two unique features: (i) it relaxes the ordering rules to a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">predicate</i>; (ii) it enables users to independently verify if their transactions comply with the predicate for concrete applications. We also provide a scheme that achieves verifiable fairness, leveraging trusted hardware. Unlike prior works that usually design a dedicated consensus protocol to achieve fairness, our scheme can be integrated with any blockchain system. Our evaluation results on Amazon EC2 using up to 120 instances across different regions show that our construction imposes only minimal overhead on existing blockchain systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2025.3611175
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transaction Fairness in Blockchains, Revisited

Xueping Hu, Sisi Duan, Rujia Li, Qi Wang et al.
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Transaction Fairness in Blockchains, Revisited

Xueping Hu, Sisi Duan, Rujia Li, Qi Wang, Qin Wang
article en

Abstract

With the growing number of decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, transaction fairness in blockchains has gained much research interest. As a broad concept in distributed systems and blockchains, fairness has been used in different contexts, varying from ones related to the liveness of the system to ones that focus on the received order of transactions. In this work, we revisit the fairness definitions and find that existing fairness definitions are not adapted to blockchains with multiple DApps. We then provide a more generic one called <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">verifiable fairness</i>. Compared with prior definitions, our notion has two unique features: (i) it relaxes the ordering rules to a <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">predicate</i>; (ii) it enables users to independently verify if their transactions comply with the predicate for concrete applications. We also provide a scheme that achieves verifiable fairness, leveraging trusted hardware. Unlike prior works that usually design a dedicated consensus protocol to achieve fairness, our scheme can be integrated with any blockchain system. Our evaluation results on Amazon EC2 using up to 120 instances across different regions show that our construction imposes only minimal overhead on existing blockchain systems.

IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingVol. 23(1)
Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), UNSW Sydney (AU), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.