Population Assessment of Anatomic Eligibility for Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap

Compared with traditional deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction procedures, robotic-assisted DIEP (R-DIEP) minimizes abdominal wall morbidity by reducing fascial incision length. Optimal R-DIEP candidates have large perforators with short intramuscular courses, but no large-scale studies have quantified their prevalence. This study aims to identify the proportion of patients who are anatomically eligible for R-DIEP.A retrospective review of patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography perforator mapping prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2023 was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. "Dominant perforator" was defined as the largest perforator at or below the level of the umbilicus. The intramuscular course of each perforator was calculated as the hypotenuse of a theoretical prism connecting its entry and exit points with respect to the rectus abdominis muscle. Perforator diameter was measured at the anterior rectus sheath. "Conservative" (intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm) and "liberal" (intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm) eligibility criteria were applied. Perforator diameter > 2 mm was used as a secondary criterion.A total of 574 dominant perforators were identified in 287 patients. The average intramuscular length of each perforator was 3.8 ± 1.9 cm (range: 0-11.0 cm). Twenty-nine percent of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 165) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 2.5 cm, 77% (<i>n</i> = 441) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 5 cm, and 2.3% (<i>n</i> = 13) were paramuscular (no intramuscular course). Forty-six percent of patients (<i>n</i> = 132) had at least one dominant perforator (i.e., left- or right-sided) with an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 93% of patients (<i>n</i> = 268) had at least one dominant perforator with an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm. Thirty-one percent of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 185) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 49% of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 281) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm.A substantial portion of the population is anatomically eligible for R-DIEP breast reconstruction, especially when liberal criteria are applied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2025-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2702-4021
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Population Assessment of Anatomic Eligibility for Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap

Reanna Shah, Ethan Fung, Peter W. Henderson, Jacquelyn Roth et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Population Assessment of Anatomic Eligibility for Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap

Reanna Shah, Ethan Fung, Peter W. Henderson, Jacquelyn Roth, Alice Yao, Areeg Abu El Hawa, Keisha E. Montalmant, Bo Yu, Alexander Kagen, Maxwell Godek
article en

Abstract

Compared with traditional deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction procedures, robotic-assisted DIEP (R-DIEP) minimizes abdominal wall morbidity by reducing fascial incision length. Optimal R-DIEP candidates have large perforators with short intramuscular courses, but no large-scale studies have quantified their prevalence. This study aims to identify the proportion of patients who are anatomically eligible for R-DIEP.A retrospective review of patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography perforator mapping prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2023 was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. "Dominant perforator" was defined as the largest perforator at or below the level of the umbilicus. The intramuscular course of each perforator was calculated as the hypotenuse of a theoretical prism connecting its entry and exit points with respect to the rectus abdominis muscle. Perforator diameter was measured at the anterior rectus sheath. "Conservative" (intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm) and "liberal" (intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm) eligibility criteria were applied. Perforator diameter > 2 mm was used as a secondary criterion.A total of 574 dominant perforators were identified in 287 patients. The average intramuscular length of each perforator was 3.8 ± 1.9 cm (range: 0-11.0 cm). Twenty-nine percent of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 165) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 2.5 cm, 77% (<i>n</i> = 441) had an intramuscular course length ≤ 5 cm, and 2.3% (<i>n</i> = 13) were paramuscular (no intramuscular course). Forty-six percent of patients (<i>n</i> = 132) had at least one dominant perforator (i.e., left- or right-sided) with an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 93% of patients (<i>n</i> = 268) had at least one dominant perforator with an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm. Thirty-one percent of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 185) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 2.5 cm, and 49% of dominant perforators (<i>n</i> = 281) had a diameter > 2 mm and an intramuscular course ≤ 5 cm.A substantial portion of the population is anatomically eligible for R-DIEP breast reconstruction, especially when liberal criteria are applied.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Mount Sinai Health System (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.