Tracing the Radioactivist Landscape

Most of the public interpretation of nuclear technologies occurs in the places where large-scale facilities involved in, first, the Manhattan project and, later, the growth of both nuclear weapons and nuclear power have been located. These interpretive efforts are important and worthwhile, particularly as remediation efforts by the Department of Energy have often razed historic structures and other physical testaments to the nuclear landscape. But where else might we look? Where might we situate our interpretive work, and what other stories might we tell? I suggest that we think of these energy stories not as nuclear stories or atomic stories—terms that emphasize the scientific, technological, and military dimensions of nuclear energy—but as stories of radioactivity and radioactivism. Reframing our preservationist, interpretive, and commemorative work in this way both enlarges the field of what counts as a nuclear energy site or story and invites us to pay attention to a wider swath of people, especially the activists who resisted the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the expansion of nuclear power.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Parks Stewardship Forum
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5070/p5.52877
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing the Radioactivist Landscape

Amrys O. Williams
Parks Stewardship Forum
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
article

Tracing the Radioactivist Landscape

Amrys O. Williams
article en

Abstract

Most of the public interpretation of nuclear technologies occurs in the places where large-scale facilities involved in, first, the Manhattan project and, later, the growth of both nuclear weapons and nuclear power have been located. These interpretive efforts are important and worthwhile, particularly as remediation efforts by the Department of Energy have often razed historic structures and other physical testaments to the nuclear landscape. But where else might we look? Where might we situate our interpretive work, and what other stories might we tell? I suggest that we think of these energy stories not as nuclear stories or atomic stories—terms that emphasize the scientific, technological, and military dimensions of nuclear energy—but as stories of radioactivity and radioactivism. Reframing our preservationist, interpretive, and commemorative work in this way both enlarges the field of what counts as a nuclear energy site or story and invites us to pay attention to a wider swath of people, especially the activists who resisted the proliferation of nuclear weapons and the expansion of nuclear power.

Parks Stewardship ForumVol. 41(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.