Quantification of the impacts of interdependent claim causes in construction

Purpose Causes of construction claims often result in severe impacts on construction projects. However, previous studies have evaluated the impacts of claim causes in isolation, neglecting their interdependence. This study aims to quantify the impacts of claim causes with the consideration of their interdependence in the context of Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach About 13 claim causes are identified from an extensive literature review and further verified by nine experts, each with at least six years of experience in claim management, through two rounds of interviews. Next, using a structured questionnaire, personal interviews with the previous nine experts are conducted to grasp the causal relationships between pairs of claim causes, which are then used to determine the interdependence among claim causes in a hierarchical manner using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Subsequently, by adopting a purposive sampling strategy in a questionnaire survey, historical data on the 13 claim causes are collected from 112 project personnel to verify the interdependence. The impacts of interdependent claim causes are quantified by aggregating four proposed criteria, namely, the time impact level, the cost impact level, the number of paths and the strength of correlations. Findings This study identifies 13 causes of construction claims and their interdependence in Vietnam. The quantitative analysis reveals that “termination/suspension of works” is the most critical interdependent claim cause, followed by “delivery/completion of works.” Notably, despite being an independent claim cause, “change orders by project owners” is ranked third. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by providing a novel approach to quantifying the impacts of interdependent claim causes in construction. The findings could be a valuable reference for construction practitioners to identify and focus on critical claim causes, thereby reducing their likelihood of occurrence and impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-01-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantification of the impacts of interdependent claim causes in construction

Veerasak Likhitruangsilp, Sang Quang Van, Photios G. Ioannou
Built Environment Project and Asset Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Quantification of the impacts of interdependent claim causes in construction

Veerasak Likhitruangsilp, Sang Quang Van, Photios G. Ioannou
article en

Abstract

Purpose Causes of construction claims often result in severe impacts on construction projects. However, previous studies have evaluated the impacts of claim causes in isolation, neglecting their interdependence. This study aims to quantify the impacts of claim causes with the consideration of their interdependence in the context of Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach About 13 claim causes are identified from an extensive literature review and further verified by nine experts, each with at least six years of experience in claim management, through two rounds of interviews. Next, using a structured questionnaire, personal interviews with the previous nine experts are conducted to grasp the causal relationships between pairs of claim causes, which are then used to determine the interdependence among claim causes in a hierarchical manner using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Subsequently, by adopting a purposive sampling strategy in a questionnaire survey, historical data on the 13 claim causes are collected from 112 project personnel to verify the interdependence. The impacts of interdependent claim causes are quantified by aggregating four proposed criteria, namely, the time impact level, the cost impact level, the number of paths and the strength of correlations. Findings This study identifies 13 causes of construction claims and their interdependence in Vietnam. The quantitative analysis reveals that “termination/suspension of works” is the most critical interdependent claim cause, followed by “delivery/completion of works.” Notably, despite being an independent claim cause, “change orders by project owners” is ranked third. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by providing a novel approach to quantifying the impacts of interdependent claim causes in construction. The findings could be a valuable reference for construction practitioners to identify and focus on critical claim causes, thereby reducing their likelihood of occurrence and impacts.

Built Environment Project and Asset ManagementVol. 16(1)
Chulalongkorn University (TH), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.