Defining and characterizing intelligent robots

Purpose The 2020s are characterized by the rising use of non-human agents in businesses due to new opportunities for artificial intelligence (AI) at work. Although these so-called intelligent robots have been present in organizations before, they are now obtaining much higher robot intelligence levels. The diverse range of robots necessitates a deeper understanding of robot-related intelligence, especially because the term “intelligent robot” is often used imprecisely. This study derives a definition and characterization with minimum requirements for labeling a machine as a robot and a robot as an intelligent robot, providing a foundation for future exploration. Design/methodology/approach We present a structured literature analysis (i.e. using the systematic literature review or SLR method), followed by an iterative artefact development approach (i.e. using design-science research). The objective is to derive a comprehensive definition and characterization of intelligent robots. Findings The study identifies critical criteria to differentiate intelligent robots from other machines and robots. It highlights the increasing role of intelligent robots in business process management and information systems fields and underscores the need for consistent terminology. Our findings help scholars avoid inconsistencies when referring to intelligent robots and help focus future research. Research limitations/implications Since the findings are based on existing literature and iterative theoretical development, their applicability may be limited in rapidly evolving contexts. Hence, we also suggest future empirical validation and refinement in diverse organizational settings. Practical implications The definition and characterization support practitioners in identifying and implementing intelligent robots effectively in business processes. This understanding aids in communication between stakeholders and the strategic integration of robotic technologies. Originality/value This study contributes to robotics and AI literature by addressing the conceptual vagueness surrounding intelligent robots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Process Management Journal
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-12-2024-1225
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining and characterizing intelligent robots

Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni, Ralf Plattfaut, Amy Van Looy, Isabella Urban
Business Process Management Journal
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
article

Defining and characterizing intelligent robots

Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni, Ralf Plattfaut, Amy Van Looy, Isabella Urban
article en

Abstract

Purpose The 2020s are characterized by the rising use of non-human agents in businesses due to new opportunities for artificial intelligence (AI) at work. Although these so-called intelligent robots have been present in organizations before, they are now obtaining much higher robot intelligence levels. The diverse range of robots necessitates a deeper understanding of robot-related intelligence, especially because the term “intelligent robot” is often used imprecisely. This study derives a definition and characterization with minimum requirements for labeling a machine as a robot and a robot as an intelligent robot, providing a foundation for future exploration. Design/methodology/approach We present a structured literature analysis (i.e. using the systematic literature review or SLR method), followed by an iterative artefact development approach (i.e. using design-science research). The objective is to derive a comprehensive definition and characterization of intelligent robots. Findings The study identifies critical criteria to differentiate intelligent robots from other machines and robots. It highlights the increasing role of intelligent robots in business process management and information systems fields and underscores the need for consistent terminology. Our findings help scholars avoid inconsistencies when referring to intelligent robots and help focus future research. Research limitations/implications Since the findings are based on existing literature and iterative theoretical development, their applicability may be limited in rapidly evolving contexts. Hence, we also suggest future empirical validation and refinement in diverse organizational settings. Practical implications The definition and characterization support practitioners in identifying and implementing intelligent robots effectively in business processes. This understanding aids in communication between stakeholders and the strategic integration of robotic technologies. Originality/value This study contributes to robotics and AI literature by addressing the conceptual vagueness surrounding intelligent robots.

Business Process Management Journal
University of Bunda Mulia (ID), Ghent University (BE), Pranalytica (United States) (US), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.