A Novel Relational Vector Method Integrated with Root Assessment Method for Evaluating Advanced Trauma Detection Models

This research proposes an innovative Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for assessing trauma injury detection models within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This proposed framework aims to address the issues that previous MCDM approaches have encountered, including imbalanced data prioritization, ranking instability, and distortions resulting from data transformation. To address these issues, this study proposes a novel method of assigning weights, referred to as the Relational Vector Method (RVM), which utilizes expert opinion to overcome the inconsistencies inherent in the traditional pairwise comparison method. The alternatives are ranked with the Root Assessment Method (RAM). This technique provides stable, para-free, elitist, and transformation-free ranks that are independent of weighted value adjustments. It includes both benefit and cost criteria without requiring normalization or complex recalibration. A total of 32 hybrid models are evaluated based on seven evaluation criteria. Weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using a new subjective weighting technique, the RVM. RAM is applied to benchmark models and selects the best for trauma patients in intensive care units (ICUs). The RVM weighting process assigned the highest importance to classification accuracy (0.1945), precision (0.1676), and recall (0.1468). The RAM ranking identified the Gini Index with Decision Tree (GI-DT), Information Gain with Decision Tree (IG-DT), and Information Gain with Naïve Bayes (IG-Naive B) as the top-performing models with RAM scores of 0.024996, 0.024846, and 0.022041, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is thoroughly validated using sensitivity assessment. Based on the comparative analysis performed, the results of the proposed framework outperformed the existing frameworks. This research advances the field of medical informatics by providing a methodological framework for enhancing the detection and prioritization of trauma injury models designed explicitly for ICU settings. This research contributes to the advancement of MCDM theory by addressing rank reversal, inconsistency, parameter sensitivity, and interpretability, which remain open challenges in existing methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s021962202650001x
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Relational Vector Method Integrated with Root Assessment Method for Evaluating Advanced Trauma Detection Models

Rula A. Hamid, A. S. Albahri, Che Zalina Zulkifli, Salem Garfan et al.
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
article

A Novel Relational Vector Method Integrated with Root Assessment Method for Evaluating Advanced Trauma Detection Models

Rula A. Hamid, A. S. Albahri, Che Zalina Zulkifli, Salem Garfan, Tahsien Al‐Quraishi, Khamis A. Zidan, Iman Mohamad Sharaf, A. H. Alamoodi, Gang Kou, Fahd S. Alotaibi, Jameel R. Al‐Obaidi, O. S. Albahri
article en

Abstract

This research proposes an innovative Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for assessing trauma injury detection models within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This proposed framework aims to address the issues that previous MCDM approaches have encountered, including imbalanced data prioritization, ranking instability, and distortions resulting from data transformation. To address these issues, this study proposes a novel method of assigning weights, referred to as the Relational Vector Method (RVM), which utilizes expert opinion to overcome the inconsistencies inherent in the traditional pairwise comparison method. The alternatives are ranked with the Root Assessment Method (RAM). This technique provides stable, para-free, elitist, and transformation-free ranks that are independent of weighted value adjustments. It includes both benefit and cost criteria without requiring normalization or complex recalibration. A total of 32 hybrid models are evaluated based on seven evaluation criteria. Weight coefficients for these metrics are determined using a new subjective weighting technique, the RVM. RAM is applied to benchmark models and selects the best for trauma patients in intensive care units (ICUs). The RVM weighting process assigned the highest importance to classification accuracy (0.1945), precision (0.1676), and recall (0.1468). The RAM ranking identified the Gini Index with Decision Tree (GI-DT), Information Gain with Decision Tree (IG-DT), and Information Gain with Naïve Bayes (IG-Naive B) as the top-performing models with RAM scores of 0.024996, 0.024846, and 0.022041, respectively. The proposed MCDM framework is thoroughly validated using sensitivity assessment. Based on the comparative analysis performed, the results of the proposed framework outperformed the existing frameworks. This research advances the field of medical informatics by providing a methodological framework for enhancing the detection and prioritization of trauma injury models designed explicitly for ICU settings. This research contributes to the advancement of MCDM theory by addressing rank reversal, inconsistency, parameter sensitivity, and interpretability, which remain open challenges in existing methods.

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Sultan Idris Education University (MY), Applied Science Private University (JO), Federation University (AU), Mustansiriyah University (IQ), Higher Technological Institute (EG), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology (CN), Jadara University (JO), Victorian Institute of Teaching (AU), Iraqi University (IQ), Imam Sadiq University (IR), Shanghai Zhangjiang Laboratory (CN), University of Information Technology and Communications (IQ), Mazaya University College
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.