Responsibility for AI Inventions

Responsibility for the activities and products generated by artificial intelligence (AI) is a topic currently debated by scholars. However, less attention has been given to the case of inventions created by AI. Who should be held responsible for these inventions? How can we address the negative consequences arising from AI-generated inventions? In this article, we aim to highlight some unique aspects of responsibility related to this specific type of invention. We examine the possibility of addressing responsibility for AI-generated inventions through the concept of ‘legal personhood’, which we conclude introduces a new set of challenges arguably even more complex to resolve. Therefore, we propose several governance tools and outline two practical approaches that have been attempted. This paper offers a tentative discussion on a novel topic within social AI research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Culture and the Humanities
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721251371279
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsibility for AI Inventions

Ana Cuevas Badallo, Benedicto Acosta
Law Culture and the Humanities
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Responsibility for AI Inventions

Ana Cuevas Badallo, Benedicto Acosta
article en

Abstract

Responsibility for the activities and products generated by artificial intelligence (AI) is a topic currently debated by scholars. However, less attention has been given to the case of inventions created by AI. Who should be held responsible for these inventions? How can we address the negative consequences arising from AI-generated inventions? In this article, we aim to highlight some unique aspects of responsibility related to this specific type of invention. We examine the possibility of addressing responsibility for AI-generated inventions through the concept of ‘legal personhood’, which we conclude introduces a new set of challenges arguably even more complex to resolve. Therefore, we propose several governance tools and outline two practical approaches that have been attempted. This paper offers a tentative discussion on a novel topic within social AI research.

Law Culture and the Humanities
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.