Gender equity in medicine: an urgent need for education and reform

Despite measurable gains, gender equity in the medical profession remains elusive, with women physicians facing persistent disparities in compensation, leadership, and advancement. These inequities, present across all World Health Organization (WHO) regions, are rooted in systemic bias and institutional culture rather than individual deficiencies. Women continue to earn significantly less than men—even after adjusting for specialty and experience—and remain underrepresented in senior leadership roles. However, evidence shows that gender-diverse leadership improves patient outcomes, institutional effectiveness, and mentorship opportunities. Programs such as targeted negotiation workshops, structured leadership development, and mentorship networks have demonstrated success in reducing gaps. Regulatory bodies, including the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) and Australia’s Medical Deans, now require demonstrable equity plans, and global standards are evolving accordingly. However, true equity requires structural reform: salary transparency, bias education, and institutional accountability must be embedded across medical training and practice. Achieving gender equity is not only a moral imperative but a strategic necessity for high-quality, inclusive healthcare delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education for Health
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2025.328
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender equity in medicine: an urgent need for education and reform

Devki Patel, Daryl Traylor, Bethany Fenton, Eboni Anderson et al.
Education for Health
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Gender equity in medicine: an urgent need for education and reform

Devki Patel, Daryl Traylor, Bethany Fenton, Eboni Anderson, Brianna S. Clark, Meghan Etsey, Darcey McCampbell
article en

Abstract

Despite measurable gains, gender equity in the medical profession remains elusive, with women physicians facing persistent disparities in compensation, leadership, and advancement. These inequities, present across all World Health Organization (WHO) regions, are rooted in systemic bias and institutional culture rather than individual deficiencies. Women continue to earn significantly less than men—even after adjusting for specialty and experience—and remain underrepresented in senior leadership roles. However, evidence shows that gender-diverse leadership improves patient outcomes, institutional effectiveness, and mentorship opportunities. Programs such as targeted negotiation workshops, structured leadership development, and mentorship networks have demonstrated success in reducing gaps. Regulatory bodies, including the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC) and Australia’s Medical Deans, now require demonstrable equity plans, and global standards are evolving accordingly. However, true equity requires structural reform: salary transparency, bias education, and institutional accountability must be embedded across medical training and practice. Achieving gender equity is not only a moral imperative but a strategic necessity for high-quality, inclusive healthcare delivery.

Education for HealthVol. 38(3)
Missouri Southern State University (US), Texas Tech University (US), University of Minnesota (US), St. George's University (GD), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), A.T. Still University (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.