In Contamination: Disturbance ecology and organization studies

Our contemporary world is marked by dense interdependencies and ecological crisis. In response, organization studies has drawn on ecological thinking to reconceptualize the relationship between organization, technology, and environment, making significant contributions to our understanding of organization in socio-ecological, media-ecological, and process-ecological terms. Yet, this reconceptualization overemphasizes the importance of stabilization and balance, leaving the field ill equipped to address the escalating precarity of our contemporary world. Therefore, we draw on disturbance ecology to develop an understanding of organization based on contamination and disturbance, rather than stabilization and balance. We argue that this approach allows organization studies to better engage with precarity as a necessary condition of existence, of being vulnerable to others, rather than a lack of stability that needs balancing. We discuss the implications of such a disturbance-ecological approach for organization studies, focusing on vulnerability, resilience, and limits as our central themes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organization Studies
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406251381044
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Contamination: Disturbance ecology and organization studies

Nicola Ens, Attila Márton
Organization Studies
Complex Systems and Decision Making
article

In Contamination: Disturbance ecology and organization studies

Nicola Ens, Attila Márton
article en

Abstract

Our contemporary world is marked by dense interdependencies and ecological crisis. In response, organization studies has drawn on ecological thinking to reconceptualize the relationship between organization, technology, and environment, making significant contributions to our understanding of organization in socio-ecological, media-ecological, and process-ecological terms. Yet, this reconceptualization overemphasizes the importance of stabilization and balance, leaving the field ill equipped to address the escalating precarity of our contemporary world. Therefore, we draw on disturbance ecology to develop an understanding of organization based on contamination and disturbance, rather than stabilization and balance. We argue that this approach allows organization studies to better engage with precarity as a necessary condition of existence, of being vulnerable to others, rather than a lack of stability that needs balancing. We discuss the implications of such a disturbance-ecological approach for organization studies, focusing on vulnerability, resilience, and limits as our central themes.

Organization Studies
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Digital Science (United States) (US), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

In Contamination: Disturbance ecology and organization studies — Nicola Ens, Attila Márton · Organization Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS