Pediatric Facial Trauma: Glasgow Coma Scale as a Predictor of Complications

There has been much debate about the utility of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in terms of predicting outcomes of pediatric trauma. While some studies state GCS can reliably predict mortality outcomes, others have stated that its dependence on verbal responses and interobserver discrepancy limit its application. In pediatric facial trauma, there is a relative lack of variables that predict functional outcomes. Applying GCS to this patient cohort may elucidate its role in this patient population and possible inclusion in a patient’s treatment decisions. This retrospective examination uses a multi-center database to evaluate pediatric (<18 years old) facial trauma patients (N = 1094) visiting 2 level-one trauma centers from 2020 to 2022. The number of complications, consultations, moderate and significant physical impairments, number of surgical interventions, and deaths were compared to the GCS score, number of soft tissue injuries and fractures, and length of hospital stay. For both AHCMC and AHWFB, a lower GCS score was the factor that most strongly correlated to post-trauma complications, significant physical impairment, and deaths ( P < .001). Acknowledging the correlation the GCS score has with outcomes can help guide healthcare decisions and expectations by informing patients and their families of potential complications based on their initial post-trauma status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACE
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016251368992
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Facial Trauma: Glasgow Coma Scale as a Predictor of Complications

Avery Wright, Amelia L. Davidson, Madison Hinson, Christopher M. Runyan et al.
FACE
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Pediatric Facial Trauma: Glasgow Coma Scale as a Predictor of Complications

Avery Wright, Amelia L. Davidson, Madison Hinson, Christopher M. Runyan, Samuel Kogan
article en

Abstract

There has been much debate about the utility of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in terms of predicting outcomes of pediatric trauma. While some studies state GCS can reliably predict mortality outcomes, others have stated that its dependence on verbal responses and interobserver discrepancy limit its application. In pediatric facial trauma, there is a relative lack of variables that predict functional outcomes. Applying GCS to this patient cohort may elucidate its role in this patient population and possible inclusion in a patient’s treatment decisions. This retrospective examination uses a multi-center database to evaluate pediatric (<18 years old) facial trauma patients (N = 1094) visiting 2 level-one trauma centers from 2020 to 2022. The number of complications, consultations, moderate and significant physical impairments, number of surgical interventions, and deaths were compared to the GCS score, number of soft tissue injuries and fractures, and length of hospital stay. For both AHCMC and AHWFB, a lower GCS score was the factor that most strongly correlated to post-trauma complications, significant physical impairment, and deaths ( P < .001). Acknowledging the correlation the GCS score has with outcomes can help guide healthcare decisions and expectations by informing patients and their families of potential complications based on their initial post-trauma status.

FACEVol. 6(4)
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.