Centralized vs. Decentralized Monitors for Hyperproperties

This article focuses on the runtime verification of hyperproperties expressed in Hyper- \(\mathsf{rec}\) HML, an expressive yet simple logic for describing properties of sets of traces. To this end, we consider a simple language of monitors that observe sets of system executions and report verdicts w.r.t. a given Hyper- \(\mathsf{rec}\) HML formula. We first employ a unique omniscient monitor that centrally observes all system traces. Since centralized monitors are not ideal for distributed settings, we also provide a language for decentralized monitors, where each trace has a dedicated monitor; these monitors yield a unique verdict by communicating their observations to one another. For both the centralized and the decentralized settings, we provide a synthesis procedure that, given a formula, yields a monitor that is correct (i.e., sound and violation complete). A key step in proving the correctness of the synthesis for decentralized monitors is a result showing that, for each formula, the synthesized centralized monitor and its corresponding decentralized one are weakly bisimilar for a suitable notion of weak bisimulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3767738
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centralized vs. Decentralized Monitors for Hyperproperties

Luca Aceto, Jana Wagemaker, Antonis Achilleos, Daniele Gorla et al.
2 citations
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
Formal Methods in Verification
3.01
article

Centralized vs. Decentralized Monitors for Hyperproperties

Luca Aceto, Jana Wagemaker, Antonis Achilleos, Daniele Gorla, Adrian Francalanza, Elli Anastasiadi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article focuses on the runtime verification of hyperproperties expressed in Hyper- \(\mathsf{rec}\) HML, an expressive yet simple logic for describing properties of sets of traces. To this end, we consider a simple language of monitors that observe sets of system executions and report verdicts w.r.t. a given Hyper- \(\mathsf{rec}\) HML formula. We first employ a unique omniscient monitor that centrally observes all system traces. Since centralized monitors are not ideal for distributed settings, we also provide a language for decentralized monitors, where each trace has a dedicated monitor; these monitors yield a unique verdict by communicating their observations to one another. For both the centralized and the decentralized settings, we provide a synthesis procedure that, given a formula, yields a monitor that is correct (i.e., sound and violation complete). A key step in proving the correctness of the synthesis for decentralized monitors is a result showing that, for each formula, the synthesized centralized monitor and its corresponding decentralized one are weakly bisimilar for a suitable notion of weak bisimulation.

ACM Transactions on Computational LogicVol. 27(1)
Reykjavík University (IS), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Iceland (IS), University of Malta (MT), Gran Sasso Science Institute (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Aalborg University (DK)
Villum Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Formal Methods in Verification
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.