The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. This adoption has long been called for, driven by expectations of efficiency and productivity gains as well as concerns about being outpaced by adjacent fields. As the initial hype around GAI fades, a more balanced understanding of AI’s promises and perils can emerge. While previous research on the perils of AI has emphasized ethical concerns such as job displacement, the potential spread of mis- and disinformation, immoral communication, and intensified social injustice, one critical issue remains largely unaddressed: the socio-ecological harm of AI use. While often perceived as immaterial, AI relies on a vast physical infrastructure, demanding the extraction and depletion of non-renewable resources, consuming extreme amounts of energy and water, and generating significant ‘e-waste’. This paper brings these overlooked costs of AI to the forefront, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Relations Inquiry
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x251377853
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

Emma Christensen
Public Relations Inquiry
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
article

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

Emma Christensen
article en

Abstract

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. This adoption has long been called for, driven by expectations of efficiency and productivity gains as well as concerns about being outpaced by adjacent fields. As the initial hype around GAI fades, a more balanced understanding of AI’s promises and perils can emerge. While previous research on the perils of AI has emphasized ethical concerns such as job displacement, the potential spread of mis- and disinformation, immoral communication, and intensified social injustice, one critical issue remains largely unaddressed: the socio-ecological harm of AI use. While often perceived as immaterial, AI relies on a vast physical infrastructure, demanding the extraction and depletion of non-renewable resources, consuming extreme amounts of energy and water, and generating significant ‘e-waste’. This paper brings these overlooked costs of AI to the forefront, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Public Relations Inquiry
Roskilde University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices — Emma Christensen · Public Relations Inquiry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS