Experimental Research on Inorganic Versus Organic Cross‐Linked Gel Systems for Mitigating CO <sub>2</sub> Leakage in Moderate‐to‐High‐Temperature Reservoirs for Long‐Term CO <sub>2</sub> Sequestration

ABSTRACT This study presents a comparative analysis of inorganic and organic cross‐linked gel systems for mitigating CO 2 leakage during geological storage operations. The polymer–cross‐linker fluid system (FS) was synthesized by cross‐linking sulfonated hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (SHPAM) with either an inorganic cross‐linker, chromium acetate (CrAc), or organic cross‐linkers, including polyethyleneimine (PEI), hydroquinone (HQ), and hexamethylene (HM). The SHPAM/CrAc system was classified as an inorganic cross‐linked FS, whereas SHPAM/PEI and SHPAM/HQ/HM were categorized as organic cross‐linked FS. To evaluate gelation time and long‐term thermal stability, conventional bottle testing and rheological analysis were conducted at various aging temperatures (90–130°C), representative of CO 2 storage reservoir conditions. Rheological characterization was performed using both continuous and oscillatory shear approaches to examine the viscous and viscoelastic properties of the FS under a pressurized super‐critical CO 2 environment (1450.0 psi [10.0 MPa]). Lastly, core‐flooding experiments conducted at 110°C under sub‐critical and super‐critical CO 2 conditions to further validated the sealing efficacy of these gel systems. Experimental results demonstrated that, regardless of the cross‐linking agents, increasing polymer concentration and aging temperature led to a significant reduction in gelation time. The key inferences obtained from the conventional bottle testing method and rheological evaluation indicate that an inorganic gel system (SHPAM/CrAc) exhibited thermal stability up to an aging temperature of 90°C, whereas an organic gel system (SHPAM/PEI) maintained thermal stability up to an aging temperature of 110°C. In contrast, the SHPAM/HQ/HM organic gel system demonstrated thermal stability across all tested aging temperatures (90–130°C). The high temperature rheological investigation using two different methods under high‐pressure CO 2 conditions showed good agreement and indicated long‐term thermal stability ranking as follows: SHPAM/HQ/HM &gt; SHPAM/PEI &gt; SHPAM/CrAc. Additionally, core‐flood tests revealed that, at the simulated reservoir temperatures of 110°C, the inorganic gel system (i.e., SHPAM/CrAc) was unable to effectively prevent CO 2 leakage due to a low plugging efficiency of less than 10.0% in both sub‐critical and super‐critical CO 2 conditions. On the other hand, under both sub‐critical and super‐critical CO 2 conditions, the SHPAM/PEI organic gel system showed a moderate plugging efficiency in the range of 44.2%–74.5%, whereas the SHPAM/HQ/HM organic gel system achieved a permeability reduction of &gt;98.0%. These studies demonstrated that polymer gel systems have potential for control of leakage in geological carbon sequestration contingent upon the appropriate selection of gel formulations tailored to specific geochemical and pressure–temperature (P–T) conditions and the ability to direct the gels to the regions where leakage is occurring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2378
Citations
2
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Research on Inorganic Versus Organic Cross‐Linked Gel Systems for Mitigating CO 2 Leakage in Moderate‐to‐High‐Temperature Reservoirs for Long‐Term CO 2 Sequestration

S.C. Majhi, Sandeep D. Kulkarni, Atul Kumar Singh, Mohd. Shahnawaz Alam
2 citations
Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
1.60
article

Experimental Research on Inorganic Versus Organic Cross‐Linked Gel Systems for Mitigating CO 2 Leakage in Moderate‐to‐High‐Temperature Reservoirs for Long‐Term CO 2 Sequestration

S.C. Majhi, Sandeep D. Kulkarni, Atul Kumar Singh, Mohd. Shahnawaz Alam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a comparative analysis of inorganic and organic cross‐linked gel systems for mitigating CO 2 leakage during geological storage operations. The polymer–cross‐linker fluid system (FS) was synthesized by cross‐linking sulfonated hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (SHPAM) with either an inorganic cross‐linker, chromium acetate (CrAc), or organic cross‐linkers, including polyethyleneimine (PEI), hydroquinone (HQ), and hexamethylene (HM). The SHPAM/CrAc system was classified as an inorganic cross‐linked FS, whereas SHPAM/PEI and SHPAM/HQ/HM were categorized as organic cross‐linked FS. To evaluate gelation time and long‐term thermal stability, conventional bottle testing and rheological analysis were conducted at various aging temperatures (90–130°C), representative of CO 2 storage reservoir conditions. Rheological characterization was performed using both continuous and oscillatory shear approaches to examine the viscous and viscoelastic properties of the FS under a pressurized super‐critical CO 2 environment (1450.0 psi [10.0 MPa]). Lastly, core‐flooding experiments conducted at 110°C under sub‐critical and super‐critical CO 2 conditions to further validated the sealing efficacy of these gel systems. Experimental results demonstrated that, regardless of the cross‐linking agents, increasing polymer concentration and aging temperature led to a significant reduction in gelation time. The key inferences obtained from the conventional bottle testing method and rheological evaluation indicate that an inorganic gel system (SHPAM/CrAc) exhibited thermal stability up to an aging temperature of 90°C, whereas an organic gel system (SHPAM/PEI) maintained thermal stability up to an aging temperature of 110°C. In contrast, the SHPAM/HQ/HM organic gel system demonstrated thermal stability across all tested aging temperatures (90–130°C). The high temperature rheological investigation using two different methods under high‐pressure CO 2 conditions showed good agreement and indicated long‐term thermal stability ranking as follows: SHPAM/HQ/HM &gt; SHPAM/PEI &gt; SHPAM/CrAc. Additionally, core‐flood tests revealed that, at the simulated reservoir temperatures of 110°C, the inorganic gel system (i.e., SHPAM/CrAc) was unable to effectively prevent CO 2 leakage due to a low plugging efficiency of less than 10.0% in both sub‐critical and super‐critical CO 2 conditions. On the other hand, under both sub‐critical and super‐critical CO 2 conditions, the SHPAM/PEI organic gel system showed a moderate plugging efficiency in the range of 44.2%–74.5%, whereas the SHPAM/HQ/HM organic gel system achieved a permeability reduction of &gt;98.0%. These studies demonstrated that polymer gel systems have potential for control of leakage in geological carbon sequestration contingent upon the appropriate selection of gel formulations tailored to specific geochemical and pressure–temperature (P–T) conditions and the ability to direct the gels to the regions where leakage is occurring.

Greenhouse Gases Science and TechnologyVol. 15(6)
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
1.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.