Can Data From Force Plate Technologies Identify Knee Loading Deficits During Squats Post ACLr

Despite a focus on restoring knee loading, knee extensor moment (KEM) deficits persist across rehab post-ACL reconstruction (ACLr). Reduced surgical KEM can be difficult to detect clinically because it is present without observable joint angle differences but with very subtle loading adjustments. This could contribute to its persistence. However, current commercial force plate technologies may allow for the clinical identification of KEM deficits. PURPOSE: This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of 3 approaches to estimate KEM deficits using: 1) vertical GRF (vGRF), 2) vGRF and center of pressure (COP), and 3) GRF and 2D moment arm (MA) data compared to gold standard (GS) approach. We hypothesize that all approaches will have strong predictive ability compared to GS but vGRF only will be least effective. METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data (3D motion capture, 2 force plates) were collected on 40 individuals (27.0 ± 10.3 years; 24 females; 113.5 ± 22.6 days post-ACLr) performing bilateral squats. Limb symmetry index (LSI, surgical/non-surgical) was calculated at peak knee flexion for all methods. GS approach used KEM calculated with inverse dynamics equations (LSI-KEMGS). LSI-GRF was calculated with vGRF. LSI-KEMCoP was calculated with vGRF and COP position using previously described methods, and LSI-KEMMA was calculated as the product of GRF and 2D sagittal plane knee MA (horizontal distance between knee axis and GRF vector). Linear regression and ICC(2,k) examined the relationship and concurrent validity between LSI-KEMGS and LSI-GRF, LSI-KEMCoP and LSI-KEMMA. Specificity and sensitivity (LSI threshold ≥0.85) determined diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: LSI-GRF, LSI-KEMCoP, and LSI-KEMMA predicted LSI-KEMGS (R2 = .56, p < .001; R2 = .74, p < .001; R2 = .85, p < .001, respectively). ICC(2,k) values were .49 (95% CI [-.22, .80]), .92 (95% CI [.85, .96]), and .96 (95% CI [.92, .98]), with sensitivity of .72, .94, 1, and specificity of 1, .5, 1. CONCLUSION: Vertical GRF data only is not adequate to detect KEM deficits. The inclusion of COP position and 2D MA data strengthened the predictive ability and resulted in superior diagnostic accuracy. These data can be derived from force plates and synchronized 2D video technologies and may be valuable detection of KEM deficits that are not clearly observable post-ACLr.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001160844.71463.d6
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Data From Force Plate Technologies Identify Knee Loading Deficits During Squats Post ACLr

Susan M. Sigward, Lori A. Michener, Jiaqi Wang
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Can Data From Force Plate Technologies Identify Knee Loading Deficits During Squats Post ACLr

Susan M. Sigward, Lori A. Michener, Jiaqi Wang
article en

Abstract

Despite a focus on restoring knee loading, knee extensor moment (KEM) deficits persist across rehab post-ACL reconstruction (ACLr). Reduced surgical KEM can be difficult to detect clinically because it is present without observable joint angle differences but with very subtle loading adjustments. This could contribute to its persistence. However, current commercial force plate technologies may allow for the clinical identification of KEM deficits. PURPOSE: This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of 3 approaches to estimate KEM deficits using: 1) vertical GRF (vGRF), 2) vGRF and center of pressure (COP), and 3) GRF and 2D moment arm (MA) data compared to gold standard (GS) approach. We hypothesize that all approaches will have strong predictive ability compared to GS but vGRF only will be least effective. METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data (3D motion capture, 2 force plates) were collected on 40 individuals (27.0 ± 10.3 years; 24 females; 113.5 ± 22.6 days post-ACLr) performing bilateral squats. Limb symmetry index (LSI, surgical/non-surgical) was calculated at peak knee flexion for all methods. GS approach used KEM calculated with inverse dynamics equations (LSI-KEMGS). LSI-GRF was calculated with vGRF. LSI-KEMCoP was calculated with vGRF and COP position using previously described methods, and LSI-KEMMA was calculated as the product of GRF and 2D sagittal plane knee MA (horizontal distance between knee axis and GRF vector). Linear regression and ICC(2,k) examined the relationship and concurrent validity between LSI-KEMGS and LSI-GRF, LSI-KEMCoP and LSI-KEMMA. Specificity and sensitivity (LSI threshold ≥0.85) determined diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: LSI-GRF, LSI-KEMCoP, and LSI-KEMMA predicted LSI-KEMGS (R2 = .56, p < .001; R2 = .74, p < .001; R2 = .85, p < .001, respectively). ICC(2,k) values were .49 (95% CI [-.22, .80]), .92 (95% CI [.85, .96]), and .96 (95% CI [.92, .98]), with sensitivity of .72, .94, 1, and specificity of 1, .5, 1. CONCLUSION: Vertical GRF data only is not adequate to detect KEM deficits. The inclusion of COP position and 2D MA data strengthened the predictive ability and resulted in superior diagnostic accuracy. These data can be derived from force plates and synchronized 2D video technologies and may be valuable detection of KEM deficits that are not clearly observable post-ACLr.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Southern California (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.