Preliminary Testing Of A Novel Exercise Instrument For Rural Cancer Survivors

PURPOSE: There are over 172,000 cancer survivors in the state of Iowa, of which 40% are rural. Cancer survivors face latent and long-term treatment side-effects that can impact exercise participation. Rural survivors have lower exercise rates and face greater disease burden and barriers to health care. Current survey tools have limited capacity to assess exercise and health behaviors in rural cancer survivors. Therefore, we aimed to deploy a newly developed survey as a preliminary exploration of participation in and perceived barriers to exercise. METHODS: Recruitment was through the institution’s universal consent. Eligible participants were aged 18-84 years diagnosed with breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancer in the last 5 years, and residents in rural counties. Based on content expert specification and end user engagement, we developed a secure web survey to assess physical activity and barriers to exercise during and after cancer treatment. We summarize survey data using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 100 individuals contacted for the initial round of survey refinement, 33 responded to the survey, of whom 3 did not meet cancer criteria, and 16 reported living in urban areas, thus a total of 14 individuals were included in analysis. Breast cancer was most common (n = 5), followed by prostate (n = 4), colorectal (n = 3), and lung (n = 2). Weekly minutes of light intensity aerobic exercise were highest (177.0 ± 253.6), followed by moderate (110.4 ± 134.0), resistance exercise (21.0 ± 37.6), and vigorous aerobic (10.0 ± 26.6). Overall, for aerobic exercise, 42.9% (n = 6) of individuals met the physical activity guidelines for Americans, and for resistance exercise 7.1% (n = 1). The most common barrier to exercise was physical side effects (n = 4 for both pre- and post-treatment), followed by lack of awareness of available exercise programs (pre-treatment n = 4, post-treatment n = 3), and time (n = 3 for both). CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings reveal predominantly light intensity, low moderate or vigorous aerobic, and resistance exercise levels in rural cancer survivors, with side effects and limited awareness of exercise programs identified as major barriers to exercise participation. Further survey optimization includes improving question specificity and broader deployment to more rural cancer survivors. Supported by: UI Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center Oberly Pilot Award (PI Gorzelitz)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157992.44960.ad
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Testing Of A Novel Exercise Instrument For Rural Cancer Survivors

A. Babcock, Caleb F. Brandner, Mary A. Kennedy, Patrick B. Barlow et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Preliminary Testing Of A Novel Exercise Instrument For Rural Cancer Survivors

A. Babcock, Caleb F. Brandner, Mary A. Kennedy, Patrick B. Barlow, Sarah H. Nash, Jessica Gorzelitz, Whitney E. Zahnd
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are over 172,000 cancer survivors in the state of Iowa, of which 40% are rural. Cancer survivors face latent and long-term treatment side-effects that can impact exercise participation. Rural survivors have lower exercise rates and face greater disease burden and barriers to health care. Current survey tools have limited capacity to assess exercise and health behaviors in rural cancer survivors. Therefore, we aimed to deploy a newly developed survey as a preliminary exploration of participation in and perceived barriers to exercise. METHODS: Recruitment was through the institution’s universal consent. Eligible participants were aged 18-84 years diagnosed with breast, lung, prostate, or colorectal cancer in the last 5 years, and residents in rural counties. Based on content expert specification and end user engagement, we developed a secure web survey to assess physical activity and barriers to exercise during and after cancer treatment. We summarize survey data using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 100 individuals contacted for the initial round of survey refinement, 33 responded to the survey, of whom 3 did not meet cancer criteria, and 16 reported living in urban areas, thus a total of 14 individuals were included in analysis. Breast cancer was most common (n = 5), followed by prostate (n = 4), colorectal (n = 3), and lung (n = 2). Weekly minutes of light intensity aerobic exercise were highest (177.0 ± 253.6), followed by moderate (110.4 ± 134.0), resistance exercise (21.0 ± 37.6), and vigorous aerobic (10.0 ± 26.6). Overall, for aerobic exercise, 42.9% (n = 6) of individuals met the physical activity guidelines for Americans, and for resistance exercise 7.1% (n = 1). The most common barrier to exercise was physical side effects (n = 4 for both pre- and post-treatment), followed by lack of awareness of available exercise programs (pre-treatment n = 4, post-treatment n = 3), and time (n = 3 for both). CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings reveal predominantly light intensity, low moderate or vigorous aerobic, and resistance exercise levels in rural cancer survivors, with side effects and limited awareness of exercise programs identified as major barriers to exercise participation. Further survey optimization includes improving question specificity and broader deployment to more rural cancer survivors. Supported by: UI Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center Oberly Pilot Award (PI Gorzelitz)

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Edith Cowan University (AU), University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.