Adherence To Nutrition Goals From A Pregnancy Nutrition And Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program (NELIP) Trial

Adherence to the nutrition component of a nutrition and exercise intervention during pregnancy can be challenging, and many studies do not report tracking changes to nutrition habits over time. Measuring the adherence to specific nutrition goals is critical for the interpretation of the success of a nutrition and exercise intervention. PURPOSE: To use a goal-specific nutrition rubric to examine nutrition adherence as part of the Nutrition and Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program (NELIP; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02804061) during pregnancy. METHODS: Pregnant individuals completed a baseline (12-18 weeks’ gestation) 3-day food intake record (3dFR) and were randomized to one of three strategies, either receiving both nutrition and exercise simultaneously (NE; n = 27), or receiving one component first and the other introduced sequentially at 25 weeks gestation (N + E; n = 30 or E + N; n = 33), completing both components to delivery. The 3dFR was repeated at 25 (midpoint) and 36 weeks’ (endpoint) gestation and scored (out of 20 points) using an analytic rubric developed for NELIP which tracked nutrition adherence to specific goals. RESULTS: Mean adherence was measured across three time points for each treatment group. The main effect of time on adherence was significant (F(2,74) = 5.71, p = 0.004), indicating adherence changed over time across all groups. The main effect of treatment group was also significant (F(2,74) = 4.16, p = 0.02), suggesting differences in adherence among the NE, N + E, and E + N groups. There was no significant interaction between time and treatment group (p = 0.15), suggesting that adherence changed similarly over time for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to specific nutrition goals measured with a rubric becomes more difficult as pregnancy progresses, irrespective of the order of delivery of a nutrition and exercise program. Future research may include identifying individual barriers to nutrition adherence in pregnancy, especially in the second and third trimester, and testing and implementing strategies accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001159492.96028.b3
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adherence To Nutrition Goals From A Pregnancy Nutrition And Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program (NELIP) Trial

Karishma Hosein, Taniya S. Nagpal, Michelle F. Mottola, Roberta Bgeginski et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Adherence To Nutrition Goals From A Pregnancy Nutrition And Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program (NELIP) Trial

Karishma Hosein, Taniya S. Nagpal, Michelle F. Mottola, Roberta Bgeginski, Harry Prapavessis, Isabelle Giroux, Stephanie Paplinskie
article en

Abstract

Adherence to the nutrition component of a nutrition and exercise intervention during pregnancy can be challenging, and many studies do not report tracking changes to nutrition habits over time. Measuring the adherence to specific nutrition goals is critical for the interpretation of the success of a nutrition and exercise intervention. PURPOSE: To use a goal-specific nutrition rubric to examine nutrition adherence as part of the Nutrition and Exercise Lifestyle Intervention Program (NELIP; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02804061) during pregnancy. METHODS: Pregnant individuals completed a baseline (12-18 weeks’ gestation) 3-day food intake record (3dFR) and were randomized to one of three strategies, either receiving both nutrition and exercise simultaneously (NE; n = 27), or receiving one component first and the other introduced sequentially at 25 weeks gestation (N + E; n = 30 or E + N; n = 33), completing both components to delivery. The 3dFR was repeated at 25 (midpoint) and 36 weeks’ (endpoint) gestation and scored (out of 20 points) using an analytic rubric developed for NELIP which tracked nutrition adherence to specific goals. RESULTS: Mean adherence was measured across three time points for each treatment group. The main effect of time on adherence was significant (F(2,74) = 5.71, p = 0.004), indicating adherence changed over time across all groups. The main effect of treatment group was also significant (F(2,74) = 4.16, p = 0.02), suggesting differences in adherence among the NE, N + E, and E + N groups. There was no significant interaction between time and treatment group (p = 0.15), suggesting that adherence changed similarly over time for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to specific nutrition goals measured with a rubric becomes more difficult as pregnancy progresses, irrespective of the order of delivery of a nutrition and exercise program. Future research may include identifying individual barriers to nutrition adherence in pregnancy, especially in the second and third trimester, and testing and implementing strategies accordingly.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Western University (CA), University of Alberta (CA), Ford Motor Company (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.