Barriers to informal social protection in Uganda: insights from beneficiaries of Village Savings and Loan Associations

Purpose While the success of Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs) has been documented, little is known about the factors affecting their performance, particularly in Uganda. This study investigated the barriers to informal social protection interventions witnessed by beneficiaries of VSLAs in Kampala District and Alebtong District, Uganda. Design/methodology/approach This study employs a quantitative approach using a questionnaire survey to collect data from a sample of 130 beneficiaries. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Findings The empirical results identified several barriers to informal social protection interventions with reference to VSLAs, with financial, structural and implementation challenges emerging as the most prominent. Statistical analysis confirmed that these challenges are significant, underscoring their critical impact on the effectiveness of the VSLAs. Practical implications These results are essential for policymakers, development practitioners and community leaders seeking to enhance the effectiveness in fostering economic resilience, social cohesion and community empowerment. Originality/value This study’s insights into the differing dynamics between on-farm and non-farm VSLAs provide a foundation for designing context-specific interventions that address the unique challenges faced by each group. Further, by informing targeted strategies to overcome these barriers, the findings contribute to strengthening informal social protection systems in Uganda and other similar contexts. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-08-2024-0639.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Economics
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-08-2024-0639
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to informal social protection in Uganda: insights from beneficiaries of Village Savings and Loan Associations

Tyanai Masiya, Stellah Lubinga, Moses Herbert Lubinga, Florence Nambooze
1 citations
International Journal of Social Economics
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
article

Barriers to informal social protection in Uganda: insights from beneficiaries of Village Savings and Loan Associations

Tyanai Masiya, Stellah Lubinga, Moses Herbert Lubinga, Florence Nambooze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose While the success of Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs) has been documented, little is known about the factors affecting their performance, particularly in Uganda. This study investigated the barriers to informal social protection interventions witnessed by beneficiaries of VSLAs in Kampala District and Alebtong District, Uganda. Design/methodology/approach This study employs a quantitative approach using a questionnaire survey to collect data from a sample of 130 beneficiaries. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. Findings The empirical results identified several barriers to informal social protection interventions with reference to VSLAs, with financial, structural and implementation challenges emerging as the most prominent. Statistical analysis confirmed that these challenges are significant, underscoring their critical impact on the effectiveness of the VSLAs. Practical implications These results are essential for policymakers, development practitioners and community leaders seeking to enhance the effectiveness in fostering economic resilience, social cohesion and community empowerment. Originality/value This study’s insights into the differing dynamics between on-farm and non-farm VSLAs provide a foundation for designing context-specific interventions that address the unique challenges faced by each group. Further, by informing targeted strategies to overcome these barriers, the findings contribute to strengthening informal social protection systems in Uganda and other similar contexts. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-08-2024-0639.

International Journal of Social Economics
Institute on Governance (CA), Baylor College of Medicine Children’s Foundation (UG), National Council of Applied Economic Research (IN), Agricultural Research Council of South Africa (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.