Different Responses In Lipid Biomarkers Between Starters And Non-starters Of Soccer Players

Biomarkers are effective indicators of training-induced adaptations. While starters and non-starters within the same team may have experienced different training loads during a season, how this affects lipid biomarkers and C-reactive protein (CRP) is not well documented. PURPOSE: To determine differences in lipid biomarkers and CRP between starters (S) (>60% match starters) and non-starters (NS) in soccer athletes. METHODS: Player load (PL), player distance (PD), velocity load (VL), and mean heart rate (HR) of 20 Division I soccer players (21 ± 1 yr) were monitored during the 2015-16 season using wearable devices. Blood samples were collected at five time points: Preseason (PS), Week 1 (WK1), Week 4 (WK4), Week 8 (WK8), and Week 12 (WK12) to assess total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), CRP, lipoprotein A, and apolipoprotein B, along with calculating TC:HDL and non-HDL:TC. Group x time repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess lipid biomarker and training load changes, with Bonferroni post hoc tests detecting differences across time points. RESULTS: Table 1 shows biomarker values at each time point. HDL was higher in S compared to NS at WK1 (MD = 13.20, 95% CI: 5.65-20.75, p = 0.003) and WK12 (MD = 12.20, 95% CI: 4.43-19.97, p = 0.006). NS had a higher TC:HDL at WK4 (MD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.08-1.14, p = 0.028), WK8 (0.56, 0.22-0.90, p = 0.005), and WK12 (0.81, 0.16-1.47, p = 0.021). CRP levels were higher in S than NS at WK1 (0.61, 0.01-1.21, p = 0.048) and WK12 (1.49, 0.26-2.71, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences between S and NS in the remaining lipid biomarkers across all time points (all p > 0.050). CONCLUSION: The differences in HDL, CRP, and TC:HDL between S and NS are likely linked to discrepancies in training load throughout the season. Tailoring training strategies to reflect the different training loads of S and NS may help to optimize health and performance for both groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001157208.22772.d0
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different Responses In Lipid Biomarkers Between Starters And Non-starters Of Soccer Players

Chris A. West, Donghyeon Kim, Andrea R. Fortunati, Elaine C. Lee et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports Performance and Training
article

Different Responses In Lipid Biomarkers Between Starters And Non-starters Of Soccer Players

Chris A. West, Donghyeon Kim, Andrea R. Fortunati, Elaine C. Lee, Robert A. Huggins, Matthew L. Hall, Joseph Grubb, Douglas J. Casa
article en

Abstract

Biomarkers are effective indicators of training-induced adaptations. While starters and non-starters within the same team may have experienced different training loads during a season, how this affects lipid biomarkers and C-reactive protein (CRP) is not well documented. PURPOSE: To determine differences in lipid biomarkers and CRP between starters (S) (>60% match starters) and non-starters (NS) in soccer athletes. METHODS: Player load (PL), player distance (PD), velocity load (VL), and mean heart rate (HR) of 20 Division I soccer players (21 ± 1 yr) were monitored during the 2015-16 season using wearable devices. Blood samples were collected at five time points: Preseason (PS), Week 1 (WK1), Week 4 (WK4), Week 8 (WK8), and Week 12 (WK12) to assess total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), CRP, lipoprotein A, and apolipoprotein B, along with calculating TC:HDL and non-HDL:TC. Group x time repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess lipid biomarker and training load changes, with Bonferroni post hoc tests detecting differences across time points. RESULTS: Table 1 shows biomarker values at each time point. HDL was higher in S compared to NS at WK1 (MD = 13.20, 95% CI: 5.65-20.75, p = 0.003) and WK12 (MD = 12.20, 95% CI: 4.43-19.97, p = 0.006). NS had a higher TC:HDL at WK4 (MD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.08-1.14, p = 0.028), WK8 (0.56, 0.22-0.90, p = 0.005), and WK12 (0.81, 0.16-1.47, p = 0.021). CRP levels were higher in S than NS at WK1 (0.61, 0.01-1.21, p = 0.048) and WK12 (1.49, 0.26-2.71, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences between S and NS in the remaining lipid biomarkers across all time points (all p > 0.050). CONCLUSION: The differences in HDL, CRP, and TC:HDL between S and NS are likely linked to discrepancies in training load throughout the season. Tailoring training strategies to reflect the different training loads of S and NS may help to optimize health and performance for both groups.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
British Athletics (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.