Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Bodyweight One-legged And Two-legged Bosu-ball And Floor Squats

PURPOSE: To quantify patellofemoral force and stress between BOSU-ball squat and floor squat, and between one-legged and two-legged squatting. METHODS: Sixteen healthy participants performed one-legged and two-legged BOSU-ball squats and floor squats. Kinematic and ground reaction force data were used to calculate resultant knee force and torque using inverse dynamics, with electromyographic data employed in a knee muscle model to predict resultant knee force and torque. A biomechanical optimization model was employed to calculate patellofemoral joint force and stress at every 10° between 10°-100° knee-angles during the squat descent and squat ascent. Repeated measures 2-way ANOVA (p < 0.01) was employed for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Collapsed across one-legged and two-legged conditions, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in floor squat than BOSU-ball squat at 40°, 50°, and 70° knee angles during squat descent and at 60° and 50° knee angles during squat ascent. Collapsed across BOSU-ball squat and floor squat, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater (p < 0.01) for one-legged squat than two-legged squat during all knee angles. Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found at 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, and100° knee angles during squat descent, and at 100°, 90°, 80°, and 70° knee angles during squat ascent. Patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in two-legged floor squat than two-legged BOSU-ball squat, but no differences were found between one-legged floor squat and one-legged BOSU-ball squat. CONCLUSIONS: Squatting progression employing lower to higher patellofemoral loading over time during patellofemoral pain rehabilitation may proceed as follows: 1) two-legged BOSU-ball squats at lower more functional knee angles (0°-50°); 2) two-legged floor squats at lower more functional knee angles (0°-50°); 3) one-legged BOSU-ball and floor squats at lower more functional knee angles (0°-50°); 4) two-legged BOSU-ball squats at lower and higher knee angles (0°-100°); 5) two-legged floor squats at lower and higher knee angles (0°-100°); 6) one-legged BOSU-ball and floor squats at lower and higher knee angles (0°-100°).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001155028.27606.d5
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Bodyweight One-legged And Two-legged Bosu-ball And Floor Squats

Robert Asuncion, Glenn S. Fleisig, Shangcheng Wang, Kevin E. Wilk et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Patellofemoral Joint Loading During Bodyweight One-legged And Two-legged Bosu-ball And Floor Squats

Robert Asuncion, Glenn S. Fleisig, Shangcheng Wang, Kevin E. Wilk, Toran D. MacLeod, Rodney Imamura, Naiquan Zheng, Irwin S. Thompson, Rafael F. Escamilla, Arnel Aguinaldo
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify patellofemoral force and stress between BOSU-ball squat and floor squat, and between one-legged and two-legged squatting. METHODS: Sixteen healthy participants performed one-legged and two-legged BOSU-ball squats and floor squats. Kinematic and ground reaction force data were used to calculate resultant knee force and torque using inverse dynamics, with electromyographic data employed in a knee muscle model to predict resultant knee force and torque. A biomechanical optimization model was employed to calculate patellofemoral joint force and stress at every 10° between 10°-100° knee-angles during the squat descent and squat ascent. Repeated measures 2-way ANOVA (p < 0.01) was employed for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Collapsed across one-legged and two-legged conditions, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in floor squat than BOSU-ball squat at 40°, 50°, and 70° knee angles during squat descent and at 60° and 50° knee angles during squat ascent. Collapsed across BOSU-ball squat and floor squat, patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater (p < 0.01) for one-legged squat than two-legged squat during all knee angles. Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found at 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, and100° knee angles during squat descent, and at 100°, 90°, 80°, and 70° knee angles during squat ascent. Patellofemoral joint force and stress were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in two-legged floor squat than two-legged BOSU-ball squat, but no differences were found between one-legged floor squat and one-legged BOSU-ball squat. CONCLUSIONS: Squatting progression employing lower to higher patellofemoral loading over time during patellofemoral pain rehabilitation may proceed as follows: 1) two-legged BOSU-ball squats at lower more functional knee angles (0°-50°); 2) two-legged floor squats at lower more functional knee angles (0°-50°); 3) one-legged BOSU-ball and floor squats at lower more functional knee angles (0°-50°); 4) two-legged BOSU-ball squats at lower and higher knee angles (0°-100°); 5) two-legged floor squats at lower and higher knee angles (0°-100°); 6) one-legged BOSU-ball and floor squats at lower and higher knee angles (0°-100°).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), American Sports Medicine Institute (US), California State University, Sacramento (US), Point Loma Nazarene University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.