Musculoskeletal Injury Rates And Workers’ Compensation Costs In Male And Female Firefighters: A Comparative Analysis

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) represent the highest reported injury category for career firefighters (FFs), yet limited data exist on MSI volume and cost, particularly for female FFs. Enhanced, gender-stratified injury surveillance could inform cost-effective MSI mitigation strategies. PURPOSE: To compare MSI claims volume and cost for male and female FFs across two fire departments: one using a direct access care model (DACM) and one with a traditional workers’ compensation model (TWCM). METHODS: Workers' compensation claims from FY2022-2023 were collected from two similarly sized fire departments (607 and 625 personnel), with one using a DACM and one a TWCM. Deidentified data excluded no-cost claims and non-MSI-related claims. Descriptive statistics were reported as normalized values per firefighter for departmental comparison. RESULTS: A total of 168 MSIs were reported, with 14 claims from female FFs (31.11% of 45 female personnel) and 144 from male FFs (12.97% of 1,187 male personnel). The DACM department incurred $428,892 in MSI costs, averaging $646.87/FF-year for males and $2,400.62/FF-year for females. In contrast, the TWCM department incurred a significantly higher MSI cost of $4,221,103, or $6,733.69/FF-year for males and $7,256.57/FF-year for females. The normalized claim cost across both departments was $320.08/FF-year for female injuries versus $17.71/FF-year for male injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Across both healthcare models, female FFs reported 2.4 times more injuries than male FFs and incurred on average 18 times higher claim costs, representing an additional $1,262 per claim per FF. Consistent with existing literature, the TWCM model resulted in substantially higher costs overall, with a 9.55-fold increase in workers' compensation expenses compared to the DACM model. Notably, female FF claims incurred higher proportional costs than their male counterparts within the DACM compared to the TWCM, highlighting an area requiring further investigation regarding mechanistic and cultural factors influencing injury occurrence and reporting that disproportionately impacts female FFs. These findings underscore the need for gender-specific MSI mitigation strategies in the fire service to better support cost parity and provide effective MSI prevention and treatment measures for all FFs. Supported by: This grant is funded by the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001158556.20650.97
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Musculoskeletal Injury Rates And Workers’ Compensation Costs In Male And Female Firefighters: A Comparative Analysis

Johanna M. Hoch, Phillip A. Gribble, Beth Rous, Mark G. Abel et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Musculoskeletal Injury Rates And Workers’ Compensation Costs In Male And Female Firefighters: A Comparative Analysis

Johanna M. Hoch, Phillip A. Gribble, Beth Rous, Mark G. Abel, Tim L. Uhl, Nicholas R. Heebner, Susannah L. Reiner, Bridget F. Melton, Nathan Ebersole
article en

Abstract

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) represent the highest reported injury category for career firefighters (FFs), yet limited data exist on MSI volume and cost, particularly for female FFs. Enhanced, gender-stratified injury surveillance could inform cost-effective MSI mitigation strategies. PURPOSE: To compare MSI claims volume and cost for male and female FFs across two fire departments: one using a direct access care model (DACM) and one with a traditional workers’ compensation model (TWCM). METHODS: Workers' compensation claims from FY2022-2023 were collected from two similarly sized fire departments (607 and 625 personnel), with one using a DACM and one a TWCM. Deidentified data excluded no-cost claims and non-MSI-related claims. Descriptive statistics were reported as normalized values per firefighter for departmental comparison. RESULTS: A total of 168 MSIs were reported, with 14 claims from female FFs (31.11% of 45 female personnel) and 144 from male FFs (12.97% of 1,187 male personnel). The DACM department incurred $428,892 in MSI costs, averaging $646.87/FF-year for males and $2,400.62/FF-year for females. In contrast, the TWCM department incurred a significantly higher MSI cost of $4,221,103, or $6,733.69/FF-year for males and $7,256.57/FF-year for females. The normalized claim cost across both departments was $320.08/FF-year for female injuries versus $17.71/FF-year for male injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Across both healthcare models, female FFs reported 2.4 times more injuries than male FFs and incurred on average 18 times higher claim costs, representing an additional $1,262 per claim per FF. Consistent with existing literature, the TWCM model resulted in substantially higher costs overall, with a 9.55-fold increase in workers' compensation expenses compared to the DACM model. Notably, female FF claims incurred higher proportional costs than their male counterparts within the DACM compared to the TWCM, highlighting an area requiring further investigation regarding mechanistic and cultural factors influencing injury occurrence and reporting that disproportionately impacts female FFs. These findings underscore the need for gender-specific MSI mitigation strategies in the fire service to better support cost parity and provide effective MSI prevention and treatment measures for all FFs. Supported by: This grant is funded by the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
University of Kentucky (US), Georgia Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.