Low-load Resistance Training To Failure Enhances Ischemic Local Muscular Endurance Capacity Over Submaximal Low-load Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction

Local muscular endurance (LME) describes the capacity of a muscle to repeatedly develop a certain degree of tension and is often measured by the number of repetitions to task failure using a percentage of one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength. Low-load resistance training performed to task failure with and without blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to similarly increase LME. However, the effects of submaximal (i.e., non-failure) low-load training with and without BFR on ischemic LME (I-LME; repetitions to task failure under ischemia) have not been extensively studied. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of submaximal low-load resistance training (30% 1RM) with and without BFR on changes in I-LME compared to low-load training to task failure. METHODS: A between-group, repeated measures design in which 130 participants (18-35 years) were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups was used: (1) submaximal low-load exercise with BFR applied at 80% arterial occlusion (LL + BFR, n = 32), (2) submaximal low-load exercise without BFR (LL, n = 33); (3) low-load exercise to task failure (LL + FAIL, n = 33); (4) time-matched non-exercise control (CON, n = 32). The training groups performed 2 sets of unilateral elbow flexions (dominant arm) 3x/week, for 6-weeks. The CON group only completed pre- and post-measurements of 1RM and I-LME testing, which involved 1 set of 30% pre-1RM unilateral elbow flexions (dominant arm) to task failure with BFR (80% arterial occlusion) at a cadence of 2 s/rep (1 s concentric/eccentric). ANCOVA function of BAIN was used to compare the mean change scores for the number of repetitions under ischemia. Data are presented as mean (SE). RESULTS: All training groups saw an increase in I-LME compared to CON (posterior probability of 0.83). The LL + FAIL observed the greatest change (17.1 SE 2.2 reps) followed by LL + BFR (9.8 SE 2.2 reps), and then LL (4.2 SE 2.2 reps). The change in number of repetitions completed during training (first to final session) was 9, 8, and 253 for LL, LL + BFR, and LL + FAIL, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current data suggest that low-load resistance exercise can effectively increase I-LME. However, greater adaptations occurred for the groups training similar to how testing was performed. Future work might include a group that exercises to task failure under BFR to see if I-LME can be increased further.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001154496.52674.56
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-load Resistance Training To Failure Enhances Ischemic Local Muscular Endurance Capacity Over Submaximal Low-load Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction

Emily E. Metcalf, William B. Hammert, Witalo Kassiano, Ryo Kataoka et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Low-load Resistance Training To Failure Enhances Ischemic Local Muscular Endurance Capacity Over Submaximal Low-load Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction

Emily E. Metcalf, William B. Hammert, Witalo Kassiano, Ryo Kataoka, Yujiro Yamada, Jeremy P. Loenneke, Jun Seob Song, Anna Kang, Robert W. Sallberg
article en

Abstract

Local muscular endurance (LME) describes the capacity of a muscle to repeatedly develop a certain degree of tension and is often measured by the number of repetitions to task failure using a percentage of one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength. Low-load resistance training performed to task failure with and without blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to similarly increase LME. However, the effects of submaximal (i.e., non-failure) low-load training with and without BFR on ischemic LME (I-LME; repetitions to task failure under ischemia) have not been extensively studied. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of submaximal low-load resistance training (30% 1RM) with and without BFR on changes in I-LME compared to low-load training to task failure. METHODS: A between-group, repeated measures design in which 130 participants (18-35 years) were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups was used: (1) submaximal low-load exercise with BFR applied at 80% arterial occlusion (LL + BFR, n = 32), (2) submaximal low-load exercise without BFR (LL, n = 33); (3) low-load exercise to task failure (LL + FAIL, n = 33); (4) time-matched non-exercise control (CON, n = 32). The training groups performed 2 sets of unilateral elbow flexions (dominant arm) 3x/week, for 6-weeks. The CON group only completed pre- and post-measurements of 1RM and I-LME testing, which involved 1 set of 30% pre-1RM unilateral elbow flexions (dominant arm) to task failure with BFR (80% arterial occlusion) at a cadence of 2 s/rep (1 s concentric/eccentric). ANCOVA function of BAIN was used to compare the mean change scores for the number of repetitions under ischemia. Data are presented as mean (SE). RESULTS: All training groups saw an increase in I-LME compared to CON (posterior probability of 0.83). The LL + FAIL observed the greatest change (17.1 SE 2.2 reps) followed by LL + BFR (9.8 SE 2.2 reps), and then LL (4.2 SE 2.2 reps). The change in number of repetitions completed during training (first to final session) was 9, 8, and 253 for LL, LL + BFR, and LL + FAIL, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current data suggest that low-load resistance exercise can effectively increase I-LME. However, greater adaptations occurred for the groups training similar to how testing was performed. Future work might include a group that exercises to task failure under BFR to see if I-LME can be increased further.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 57(10S)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (BR), Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US), University of Mississippi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.