When do supply-side drug control policies save lives? Evidence from pharmacy methadone restrictions

The literature commonly finds that supply-side drug control policies are an ineffective response to drug epidemics because they cause substitution to more dangerous illicit drugs. We document a policy that was implemented in response to the intertwined methadone and prescription opioid epidemics in the U.S. in the early 2000s and that sharply contradicts this. In 2008, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and drug manufacturers halted shipments of highly potent methadone formulations to all pharmacies nationwide due to concerns over their involvement in rising overdose death rates. However, rather than causing substitution to illicit drugs, we show this response caused substitution to safer methadone products and prevented roughly 1,600 overdose deaths over a two-year period. Findings underscore that supply-side drug control policies can be effective responses to drug epidemics in contexts where they are appropriately targeted to push consumers towards safer rather than more harmful substances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Economics
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103067
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When do supply-side drug control policies save lives? Evidence from pharmacy methadone restrictions

J. Travis Donahoe, Coleman Drake
Journal of Health Economics
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

When do supply-side drug control policies save lives? Evidence from pharmacy methadone restrictions

J. Travis Donahoe, Coleman Drake
article en

Abstract

The literature commonly finds that supply-side drug control policies are an ineffective response to drug epidemics because they cause substitution to more dangerous illicit drugs. We document a policy that was implemented in response to the intertwined methadone and prescription opioid epidemics in the U.S. in the early 2000s and that sharply contradicts this. In 2008, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and drug manufacturers halted shipments of highly potent methadone formulations to all pharmacies nationwide due to concerns over their involvement in rising overdose death rates. However, rather than causing substitution to illicit drugs, we show this response caused substitution to safer methadone products and prevented roughly 1,600 overdose deaths over a two-year period. Findings underscore that supply-side drug control policies can be effective responses to drug epidemics in contexts where they are appropriately targeted to push consumers towards safer rather than more harmful substances.

Journal of Health EconomicsVol. 104
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When do supply-side drug control policies save lives? Evidence from pharmacy methadone restrictions — J. Travis Donahoe, Coleman Drake · Journal of Health Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS