POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: THE SEARCH FOR A JUST SOCIETY

This article explores the intersections between political philosophy and philosophical anthropology in the context of contemporary global challenges. Drawing on both classical sources (Plato, Hobbes, Rousseau, Marx) and modern theorists (Honneth, Habermas, Nussbaum, Latour), the study rethinks justice as a dynamic, relational, and contextsensitive concept grounded in the changing nature of the human subject. The research demonstrates that modern political strategies of justice must transcend universalist models and instead be rooted in anthropological realitiesrecognizing the embeddedness of individuals in cultural, social, ecological, and technological networks. The article synthesizes key theoretical perspectives on recognition, participatory democracy, intersectional justice, global redistribution, and environmental responsibility. Methodologically, the study adopts an interdisciplinary framework combining hermeneutic analysis, conceptual mapping, and critical theory. It argues that justice in the 21st century cannot be reduced to procedural fairness or resource distribution but must be understood as an ongoing negotiation of human vulnerability, plurality, and interdependence. The article concludes that philosophical anthropology provides a necessary foundation for reimagining political institutions capable of supporting inclusive, adaptive, and ecologically sustainable forms of justice in a post-global world.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Metafizika Journal
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33864/2617-751x.2025.v8.i6.321-337
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: THE SEARCH FOR A JUST SOCIETY

Nargiz Medzhidova
Metafizika Journal
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: THE SEARCH FOR A JUST SOCIETY

Nargiz Medzhidova
article en

Abstract

This article explores the intersections between political philosophy and philosophical anthropology in the context of contemporary global challenges. Drawing on both classical sources (Plato, Hobbes, Rousseau, Marx) and modern theorists (Honneth, Habermas, Nussbaum, Latour), the study rethinks justice as a dynamic, relational, and contextsensitive concept grounded in the changing nature of the human subject. The research demonstrates that modern political strategies of justice must transcend universalist models and instead be rooted in anthropological realitiesrecognizing the embeddedness of individuals in cultural, social, ecological, and technological networks. The article synthesizes key theoretical perspectives on recognition, participatory democracy, intersectional justice, global redistribution, and environmental responsibility. Methodologically, the study adopts an interdisciplinary framework combining hermeneutic analysis, conceptual mapping, and critical theory. It argues that justice in the 21st century cannot be reduced to procedural fairness or resource distribution but must be understood as an ongoing negotiation of human vulnerability, plurality, and interdependence. The article concludes that philosophical anthropology provides a necessary foundation for reimagining political institutions capable of supporting inclusive, adaptive, and ecologically sustainable forms of justice in a post-global world.

Metafizika JournalVol. 8(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.