Islamic Social Teaching and <i>Cathonomics</i>

Islamic analogues to Catholic social teachings are presented for the first time in this article, which examines Anthony Annett’s ten concrete principles for socio-economic action in his Cathonomics: How Catholic Tradition Can Create a More Just Economy from an Islamic perspective. While all ten of Annett’s principles are laudable from this perspective, his principle of “integral human development” remains underdeveloped from an Islamic point of view, because he does not adequately distinguish between “holistic work”, which fulfills a hierarchy of spiritual and other needs and “deformed work”, which does not. This lacuna undermines one’s ability to adequately: (1) distinguish between an Islamic and Catholic economy and industrial capitalism and socialism; (2) critique industrial capitalism and socialism from an Islamic or Catholic perspective, particularly regarding the environmental crisis, and (3) draw the (devastating) implications of this for modern mainstream economic theory. This omission therefore represents the “Achilles heel” of Annett’s otherwise erudite book.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics Management and Religion
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2737436x25400096
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Islamic Social Teaching and Cathonomics

Waleed El‐Ansary
Journal of Economics Management and Religion
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Islamic Social Teaching and Cathonomics

Waleed El‐Ansary
article en

Abstract

Islamic analogues to Catholic social teachings are presented for the first time in this article, which examines Anthony Annett’s ten concrete principles for socio-economic action in his Cathonomics: How Catholic Tradition Can Create a More Just Economy from an Islamic perspective. While all ten of Annett’s principles are laudable from this perspective, his principle of “integral human development” remains underdeveloped from an Islamic point of view, because he does not adequately distinguish between “holistic work”, which fulfills a hierarchy of spiritual and other needs and “deformed work”, which does not. This lacuna undermines one’s ability to adequately: (1) distinguish between an Islamic and Catholic economy and industrial capitalism and socialism; (2) critique industrial capitalism and socialism from an Islamic or Catholic perspective, particularly regarding the environmental crisis, and (3) draw the (devastating) implications of this for modern mainstream economic theory. This omission therefore represents the “Achilles heel” of Annett’s otherwise erudite book.

Journal of Economics Management and ReligionVol. 06(02)
Xavier University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Islamic Social Teaching and <i>Cathonomics</i> — Waleed El‐Ansary · Journal of Economics Management and Religion (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS