Using total abundance as a proxy for wild bee species richness: A practical tool for non‐experts

Abstract As there is growing interest among non‐specialists in participating in pollinator conservation initiatives, developing proxies for wild bee species richness that could be potentially used by non‐experts can aid conservation, decision support systems for managers and policymakers, and create entry points for future taxonomists. We used data from 63 independent studies in which wild bees were sampled, covering all main European habitats and climates. We tested two proxies for wild bee species richness: abundance of all wild bees (excluding the honeybee) and abundance of bumblebees. These proxies require basic taxonomic training and have the potential for routine implementation by non‐experts. Within‐region, the abundance of wild bees was a strong predictor of wild bee species richness at the local scale, with an average correlation exceeding 0.80. Bumblebee abundance was a poorer proxy for total wild bee species richness (correlation coefficient of ~0.55) and was unsuitable for warm‐temperate and Mediterranean climates. Observed abundance‐richness correlations were consistent across climates, habitats and sampling methods, suggesting that, after a simple training, counting all bee individuals in transect walks provides a non‐lethal, robust estimate of wild bee species richness. We observed a weak negative relationship between sample coverage and the strength of the abundance‐richness correlation. Synthesis and applications. The use of a simple but effective proxy could be an important starting point for the expansion of wild bee monitoring initiatives at the regional scale, particularly given the growing involvement of non‐specialists. We provided here a simple implementation framework to use this proxy in rapid biodiversity assessments, such as the evaluation of payment‐by‐result schemes by farmers and measuring the efficacy of conservation actions in urban green areas or protected areas by citizens and site managers, respectively. It is important to stress that we are not advocating for the replacement of the urgently needed long‐term monitoring of pollinator status and trends. Instead, we propose that employing an effective proxy for non‐experts could enhance the evaluation of many local and regional conservation initiatives that currently lack any basic assessment schemes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Ecology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70167
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using total abundance as a proxy for wild bee species richness: A practical tool for non‐experts

Cristina Craioveanu, Fabien Spicher, Anja Schmidt, Monika Wulf et al.
5 citations
Journal of Applied Ecology
Plant and animal studies
15.13
article

Using total abundance as a proxy for wild bee species richness: A practical tool for non‐experts

Cristina Craioveanu, Fabien Spicher, Anja Schmidt, Monika Wulf, Annette Kolb, Ola Lundin, Imre Sándor Piross, Hans Henrik Bruun, David Kleijn, Reet Karise, Sonja Mudri‐Stojnić, Riccardo Bommarco, Toshko Ljubomirov, Viktor Szigeti, Kris Verheyen, Lorna J. Cole, Marie Winsa, Anikó Kovács‐Hostyánszki, Róbert Gallé, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Andràs Báldí, Douglas B. Sponsler, Chloé A. Raderschall, Lorenzo Marini, Francisco P. Molina, Corina Maurer, Elena Velado‐Alonso, Andree Cappellari, Michael P. D. Garratt, Guillaume Decocq, Willem Proesmans, Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter, Audrey Labonté, Egle Liiskmann, Snežana Radenković, Adam J. Vanbergen, Deepa Senapathi, Anina Knauer, Ante Vujić, Matthias Albrecht, Edina Török, Imre Demeter, Natalia Timuş, Andrea Holzschuh, Erik Öckinger, Jeroen Scheper, Oliver Schweiger, Josef Settele, Giovanni Tamburini, Ígnasi Bartomeus, Costanza Geppert, Martin Diekmann, Péter Batáry, Elena Gazzea, Simon G. Potts, Nerea Montes‐Pérez, Klara Leander Oh
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract As there is growing interest among non‐specialists in participating in pollinator conservation initiatives, developing proxies for wild bee species richness that could be potentially used by non‐experts can aid conservation, decision support systems for managers and policymakers, and create entry points for future taxonomists. We used data from 63 independent studies in which wild bees were sampled, covering all main European habitats and climates. We tested two proxies for wild bee species richness: abundance of all wild bees (excluding the honeybee) and abundance of bumblebees. These proxies require basic taxonomic training and have the potential for routine implementation by non‐experts. Within‐region, the abundance of wild bees was a strong predictor of wild bee species richness at the local scale, with an average correlation exceeding 0.80. Bumblebee abundance was a poorer proxy for total wild bee species richness (correlation coefficient of ~0.55) and was unsuitable for warm‐temperate and Mediterranean climates. Observed abundance‐richness correlations were consistent across climates, habitats and sampling methods, suggesting that, after a simple training, counting all bee individuals in transect walks provides a non‐lethal, robust estimate of wild bee species richness. We observed a weak negative relationship between sample coverage and the strength of the abundance‐richness correlation. Synthesis and applications. The use of a simple but effective proxy could be an important starting point for the expansion of wild bee monitoring initiatives at the regional scale, particularly given the growing involvement of non‐specialists. We provided here a simple implementation framework to use this proxy in rapid biodiversity assessments, such as the evaluation of payment‐by‐result schemes by farmers and measuring the efficacy of conservation actions in urban green areas or protected areas by citizens and site managers, respectively. It is important to stress that we are not advocating for the replacement of the urgently needed long‐term monitoring of pollinator status and trends. Instead, we propose that employing an effective proxy for non‐experts could enhance the evaluation of many local and regional conservation initiatives that currently lack any basic assessment schemes.

Journal of Applied EcologyVol. 62(11)
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Mons (BE), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Padua (IT), University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Bremen (DE), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EE), Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG), University of Würzburg (DE), Scotland's Rural College (GB), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Ghent University (BE), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Institute of Ecology and Botany (HU), Agroécologie (FR), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE), Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés (FR), Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research (BG), HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research (HU), Institut Agro Dijon (FR), Agroscope (CH), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Reading (GB), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Plant and animal studies
15.13
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.