Explaining acceptance and acceptability of connected automated vehicles: the impact of evaluations of attributes and traffic complexity

Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs) may, when available, be able to reduce greenhouse gasses emissions caused by the transport sector, and may increase traffic safety. In order for CAVs to be adopted by the public, they first need to be accepted (i.e., evaluated positively). Therefore, it is critical to identify the predictors of CAVs’ acceptability (general evaluation before experience) and acceptance (willingness to use after experience). We examined to what extent evaluations of different attributes of CAVs are related to acceptability and acceptance, and to what extent acceptability and acceptance are related. Specifically, we hypothesised that more positive evaluations of safety, trustworthiness, instrumental, and hedonic attributes would be related to higher acceptability before experiencing a CAV, and to acceptance after experiencing a CAV. To be able to assess acceptance, we conducted a driving simulator experiment (N = 46). This enabled participants to experience a CAV in both a low and high traffic complexity scenario, and we could examine to what extent experiencing a CAV influences the evaluation of CAVs. Our results show that experiencing a CAV can enhance perceived safety and trustworthiness of CAVs. Further, both acceptability and acceptance were higher when the CAV was evaluated more positively on the attributes before and after experiencing a CAV, respectively. Safety attributes were more strongly related to acceptability than acceptance, while hedonic and instrumental attributes were more strongly related to acceptance than acceptability. In contrast to our expectations, traffic complexity did not affect acceptance, perceived safety, or trustworthiness of CAVs after the simulated drive. These results suggest that policies aimed at enhancing safety, driving pleasure, trustworthiness of CAVs, and by ensuring that CAVs are able to meet people’s mobility needs could increase both acceptability and acceptance of CAVs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Safety Research
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55329/hpix8038
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining acceptance and acceptability of connected automated vehicles: the impact of evaluations of attributes and traffic complexity

Jorick Post, Janet Veldstra, Linda Steg, Dick de Waard et al.
Traffic Safety Research
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Explaining acceptance and acceptability of connected automated vehicles: the impact of evaluations of attributes and traffic complexity

Jorick Post, Janet Veldstra, Linda Steg, Dick de Waard, Ayça Berfu Ünal
article en

Abstract

Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs) may, when available, be able to reduce greenhouse gasses emissions caused by the transport sector, and may increase traffic safety. In order for CAVs to be adopted by the public, they first need to be accepted (i.e., evaluated positively). Therefore, it is critical to identify the predictors of CAVs’ acceptability (general evaluation before experience) and acceptance (willingness to use after experience). We examined to what extent evaluations of different attributes of CAVs are related to acceptability and acceptance, and to what extent acceptability and acceptance are related. Specifically, we hypothesised that more positive evaluations of safety, trustworthiness, instrumental, and hedonic attributes would be related to higher acceptability before experiencing a CAV, and to acceptance after experiencing a CAV. To be able to assess acceptance, we conducted a driving simulator experiment (N = 46). This enabled participants to experience a CAV in both a low and high traffic complexity scenario, and we could examine to what extent experiencing a CAV influences the evaluation of CAVs. Our results show that experiencing a CAV can enhance perceived safety and trustworthiness of CAVs. Further, both acceptability and acceptance were higher when the CAV was evaluated more positively on the attributes before and after experiencing a CAV, respectively. Safety attributes were more strongly related to acceptability than acceptance, while hedonic and instrumental attributes were more strongly related to acceptance than acceptability. In contrast to our expectations, traffic complexity did not affect acceptance, perceived safety, or trustworthiness of CAVs after the simulated drive. These results suggest that policies aimed at enhancing safety, driving pleasure, trustworthiness of CAVs, and by ensuring that CAVs are able to meet people’s mobility needs could increase both acceptability and acceptance of CAVs.

Traffic Safety ResearchVol. 9
University of Groningen (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.